Sign up for Express
New from the Almanac, Express is an e-edition delivered via email each weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Menlo Park, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   ATHERTON   FICTION
  MENLO PARK   MOVIES   OTHER TOPICS PORTOLA VALLEY
  SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   THE LOCAL DISH   WOODSIDE
  REPORTERS' BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MESSAGE BOARD VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Portola Valley council rejects Cargill development
Portola Valley, posted by Editor, The Almanac Online, on Dec 14, 2010 at 1:29 pm

The Cargill Salt Corp. proposal for a residential community on a salt flat off Redwood City should instead be restored as home for creatures that lived there before it was a salt flat, the Portola Valley Town Council said in resolution adopted on Dec. 8.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, December 14, 2010, 8:45 AM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by Advocate for Nature, a resident of the Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park neighborhood, on Dec 14, 2010 at 1:29 pm

FIVE STARS GOES TO PORTOLA VALLEY'S COUNCIL FOR THEIR WISDOM!!! The bay belongs to the creatures that call it home, and to all of us. The Cargill project must not be built based on the greed of those who would profit from it.


Posted by Gene Chaput, a resident of the Portola Valley: Westridge neighborhood, on Dec 14, 2010 at 4:46 pm

Great. Way to go PV Town Council. We're behind you 100%. What a nice Christmas present.


Posted by larry, a resident of the Atherton: West Atherton neighborhood, on Dec 16, 2010 at 7:01 pm

It's Redwood City's decision. It doesn't matter what PV wants or doesn't want.


Posted by Menlo Voter, a resident of the Menlo Park: other neighborhood, on Dec 16, 2010 at 8:11 pm

"It's Redwood City's decision. It doesn't matter what PV wants or doesn't want."

[Portion removed, terms of use.]


Posted by Menlo Voter, a resident of the Menlo Park: other neighborhood, on Dec 16, 2010 at 9:14 pm

"It's Redwood City's decision. It doesn't matter what PV wants or doesn't want."

[Portion removed. Terms of use.]


Posted by Curmudgeon, a resident of another community, on Dec 30, 2010 at 12:07 pm

At a time when thousands of people are *still* commuting into local jobs from as far away as Modesto and Stockton, spewing who knows how much car exhaust and wasting precious natural resources (most notably Time, the most precious and finite resource any of us have) the myopia of a good many "environmentalists" is stupefying.

To say nothing of how many critters were displaced by development out in the remote San Joaquin Valley, rather than here in an already urbanized area.

In short, fill in the swamps, let another Foster City bloom, and give your children (and by extension your granchildren) a chance to live near you, rather than many miles away.


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

AlmanacNews.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.