Posted by Cee, a resident of the Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park neighborhood, on Apr 26, 2011 at 2:46 pm
Why does anyone need indemnity & why would Ms. Ward's relatives sue? It was a tragic accident. The driver was not at fault. Can Ms. Ward's relatives not understand that she perhaps made an error of judgment or timing which caused or contributed to her fatal accident?
Posted by Robbie, a resident of another community, on Apr 26, 2011 at 4:50 pm
I understood that his rig was too big to be on that road legally. The trucker made an error of judgement by using that road. I don't see how he can claim that someone else set up a dangerous situation for him when he wasn't supposed to be there in the first place!
Posted by Menlo Voter, a resident of the Menlo Park: other neighborhood, on Apr 26, 2011 at 5:17 pm
if the truck could not be there legally he would have been found at fault in the accident or at a minimum it would have been a contributing factor. It isn't illegal and it wasn't a contributing factor.
Posted by POGO, a resident of the Woodside: other neighborhood, on Apr 26, 2011 at 6:14 pm
Do any of you recall the O. J. Simpson trial? A criminal court found him "not guilty," but a civil court found him liable for about $30 million (as I recall) in damages for his role in the wrongful death of Ron Goldman.
THAT'S why you sue.
Just because the highway patrol found insufficient evidence (no witnesses, etc.) to fault the truck driver doesn't mean a civil jury won't find the trucker (especially one with his driving record) has some liability.
Posted by Menlo Voter, a resident of the Menlo Park: Park Forest neighborhood, on Apr 26, 2011 at 7:43 pm
Sorry POGO, OJ was jury nulification pure and simple. Unlike this case, it's not like the police didn't think he did it. It's possible a civil jury could find this driver liable, but it is only due to a lower standard for the finding of "guilt." My bet is this case settles on the court house steps. The woman's family will get their pound of flesh because the insurance company doesn't want to take the risk or expend the money to defend what is a truly defensible case. It all comes down to numbers and probablities of outcomes for the insurance company.
Posted by Robbie, a resident of another community, on Apr 26, 2011 at 7:54 pm
The Almanac didn't pick up on this thread, but the Mercury News did. On December 23, 2010:
"TRUCK IN FATAL CRASH WAS TOO HEAVY FOR AREA
Gabriel Manzur Vera was driving a big rig that was 700 pounds too heavy for unincorporated San Mateo County roads when he struck and killed a bicyclist near Portola Valley last month, a California Highway Patrol spokesman has confirmed.
Investigators checked out Vera's 26-wheel truck at the scene of the Nov. 4 collision that killed Los Altos Hills resident Lauren Ward. They concluded that the big rig had no mechanical defects, but that it was too heavy for unincorporated county...."
That is all I can pull from the archives without paying, but it confirms my memory that the trucker should not have been on that road at all.
Posted by John Slater, a resident of the Menlo Park: other neighborhood, on Apr 27, 2011 at 11:02 am
The newspapers say Ms. Ward turned into the truck. But no cyclist I have talked to can explain why somebody riding alongside a large truck would turn into the truck. The statements by the CHP are non-sense. Hopefully a court case will give this accident proper scrutiny; the CHP wasn't very motivated to spend time trying to understand what happened.
Posted by Joe, a resident of the Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park neighborhood, on Apr 27, 2011 at 12:59 pm
There is a theory that the rider turned into the side of the truck because a driver came up behind her on her left side, intent on merging left to head into Ladera.
If there was such a vehicle and if it was being driven aggressively, it could have been enough to scare the rider and cause her to lose balance or initiate evasive action. Consider your response upon hearing the acceleration and perhaps seeing in your bike mirror a large SUV coming up on what might seem like a near-collision course.
No witnesses have come forward. If this is what happened, I don't see how the CHP can ever penetrate it unless a witness comes forward.
Posted by POGO, a resident of the Woodside: other neighborhood, on Apr 28, 2011 at 10:21 am
The county will not voluntarily accept assignment of liability, of course, and the trucking company will have to sue them. I assume the trucking company has insurance and it is the insurance company that is pursuing this.