Town Square

Post a New Topic

Parcel tax Senior exemption

Original post made by Jack Hickey, Woodside: Emerald Hills, on May 1, 2011

I have always questioned the use of Senior exemptions for school district parcel tax ballot measures. And, I have suggested to Redwood City Elementary, whose last three parcel tax measures I helped defeat, that they could pass the measures, without vocal opposition, if they provided exemptions for all homeowners without children in RC schools. Clearly, not all eligible for exemptions will file.
Now, in the San Carlos parcel tax election (Measure A), the Senior exemption is getting a new spin from the Daily Post. In a front page note "Find out who doesn't pay the parcel tax", they promise to publish, on Monday morning, the names of 1,081 Seniors who have elected not to pay the existing parcel taxes. They should also state how many decided not to file.
There are 3 voting possibilities for such Seniors: YES, NO and ABSTAIN. I suspect that most of the Seniors on the Post's list will have voted NO. For those Seniors I suggest that they proudly display a lawn sign saying "Don't blame me, I voted NO". Many, who the District is counting on, will have abstained. For those Seniors on the exempt list who voted YES, hang down your head in shame.

Comments (3)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by WhoisHe?
a resident of another community
on May 5, 2011 at 11:19 am

Jack Hickey..first,the name..means nothing to me.
Also, he covers RC, San Carlos and lives in Woodside.
I am confused about seniors hanging heads and those who do not have children and I have never heard of anyone avoiding paying parcel taxes before unless going into foreclosure.
What does it mean? None of the voting choices or "possibilities" YES, NO and ABSTAIN.
I do not get what this Hickey guy expects of seniors.As a rich one,I wouldn't be adverse to paying more within reason.I also think that childless seniors most certainly should not be obligated.
It sounds nebulous, confused and scattered.Will Hickey explain it in a simple manner, or direct me to where I can read the measure?
I find the politics of just the areas he mentioned, so poorly designed,so plentiful, and really rather odd.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jack Hickey
a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on May 7, 2011 at 9:43 am

Dear WhoIsHe, Sorry for the confusion.
The "parcel tax" referred to in this discussion is an above the line add on to the 1 % property tax held in tow by Proposition 13. When seeking additional funding using parcel tax ballot measures, School Districts include exemptions for Seniors in the hope that they will not vote against the measure.
As for the voting choices, if one votes YES to support a parcel tax measure, I would expect them to pay the tax should the measure pass. Those Seniors who ABSTAIN or vote NO on the measure can legitimately file for an exemption from the tax.
The issue which prompted my initial submission was the promise by the Daily Post to publish the names of 1,081 Seniors who have elected not to pay the existing parcel taxes. They have subsequently acquiesced to the wishes of readers and decided not to publish the names.

For a glimpse of who I am, I append my recent post to the Redwood City Patch 9:01am on Saturday, May 7, 2011

As a long time opponent of the continued funding of a school system which is,
1. held hostage by powerful unions,
2. encumbered by an archaic education code and a myriad of categorical programs, and;
3. founded on compulsory attendance which has no place in a free country where liberty is cherished,
I must offer alternatives.
My Performance Accountability Voucher for Education (Web Link) is one.
Property tax credits to enable Choice in Education is another.
Regarding parcel taxes, see: Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by POGO
a resident of Woodside: other
on May 7, 2011 at 10:52 am

Jack Hickey has a long history of public service and posts his opinions under his real name. Kudos for that.

Mr. Hickey's point is that it's disingenuous for a "senior" to vote for a parcel tax and then opt out by taking the exemption. It's saying you're in favor of the tax... but I don't feel like paying it.

Parcel tax, like user fee and revenue enhancer, is the new way politicians say "TAX." Government seems to have an insatiable appetite for your money, regardless of who is in power.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 3,650 views

Charter School Proposal Steeped In Unintended Consequences
By Erin Glanville | 55 comments | 2,238 views

A Surprise!
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 1,455 views

Marriage Underachievers
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,413 views

Measure M-- I am not drinking Greenheartís expensive potion
By Martin Lamarque | 26 comments | 821 views