Voters approve transfer of small area to Menlo Park school district Schools & Kids, posted by Editor, The Almanac Online, on May 6, 2011 at 12:31 pm
Residents of 25 townhouses at 600 Willow Road in Menlo Park will be able to send their children to Menlo Park City School District schools after approving a ballot measure transferring their parcels from the Ravenswood City School District.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, May 6, 2011, 11:51 AM
Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of the Atherton: Lindenwood neighborhood, on May 6, 2011 at 10:23 pm
Racial segregation of children in our elementary schools even if based on the wealth, or lack thereof, of their parents is both illegal and immoral. This is an injustice that begs for both recognition and remedy - why the silence? Or do we save our outrage for injustices which don't benefit ourselves?
Posted by two sides to every story, a resident of the Menlo Park: The Willows neighborhood, on May 9, 2011 at 11:48 am
I like the idea of segregated schools, not so excited about the idea of placing the mandate for funding that on just my shoulders. As Superintendent Ranella pointed out, the district isn't going to see the revenues to support these students. It's "only" 4 students this year (which is works out to a cost to the district of about $50K in return for $18K of parcel tax increase).
But the reason the number is so low is that few families would want to do transfers midway through the program since relationships are established. Plan on the eventual number being between 15 and 30 students, each with a price tag of $12K/yr but only $18K of total revenue increase (NOT per student).
It's hard as an effected parent to get too excited about placing the burden directly on the school district even while supporting lofty ideals....
Posted by resident, a resident of the Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks neighborhood, on May 13, 2011 at 7:03 am
Given that the folks in Pacific Parc won't be contributing to MPCSD with their tax $$ as their development is zoned in the Redevelopment Agency area, I hope that they become significant contributers to the MPAEF! They can think of it as a Thank You! to MPCSD for the increase in their property values.
Posted by They knew, a resident of the Atherton: West of Alameda neighborhood, on May 13, 2011 at 3:20 pm
When these people bought their homes they were zoned for Ravenswood and got to pay a much lower price accordingly. Now they get to come in and freeload over the objections of both school districts? Just how bribed who on this state board to allow this travesty?
Posted by Jenny Redo, a resident of the Atherton: West Atherton neighborhood, on May 19, 2011 at 12:25 pm
Another advantage of combing districts would be to reduce the cost of admistrative overhead. A higher percentage of funds need to go to children LEARNING in our public schools.
I also believe the state really needs to fix the 2-district system. It is crazy that the districts in lower income areas receive less monies per student than the districts in higher income areas (who also have parents donating into them).
For information on California Education Policies and a way to get involved, please check out: Web Link
Posted by Carol Smith, a resident of another community, on May 19, 2011 at 2:03 pm
The objective of public education should be to help educate as many children as possible to their fullest potential. Decisions should be about maximizing the school's ability to leverage resources to achieve this goal.
Decisions should not be, in my opinion, about what's best for the adults, teachers, administrators, property values or other such issues.
It's about our children and what's best for them. They are our future.
Posted by nope, a resident of another community, on May 19, 2011 at 2:56 pm
These 25 townhomes WON'T pay the superintendent's salary because their addition to the MP Elementary district does not add a single dollar of revenue to its coffers since the local property tax revenue is already allocated (jeez, read the article).
OTOH, it will COST the Ravensdale district significant lost revenue because their district funding is based on ADA numbers.
Of course the state school board wasn't exactly an objective third party. From their perspective any time you can get students out of a Revenue Limit district they come out ahead.....
Posted by Hmmm, a resident of another community, on May 20, 2011 at 7:49 pm
Peter, thank you for your heartfelt opinions and ideas re this issue. I lived in The Willows for many years and lousy schools were part of why I had a private school education, which meant of course, my parents really put their money where their mouths were.
It makes me sad to see such snobbery & elitism trump more thoughtful, fair solutions for everyone. I can imagine the fight ahead for those who want to combine school districts. Quelle horreur to have The Willows children or other westside of 101 residents' kids cheek by jowl with poorer kids!