Atherton: Garbage rates, ethics panel Atherton, posted by Editor, The Almanac Online, on May 17, 2011 at 2:30 pm
The Atherton City Council will review and possibly approve higher garbage rates, and discuss proposals by two council colleagues that would create an ethics and oversight board for the town, and establish rules on private donations made to the police department when it meets on Wednesday, May 18.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, May 17, 2011, 9:50 AM
Posted by Ed, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on May 17, 2011 at 2:30 pm
Ex Atherton Council member Didi Fisher has not attended a single council meeting since she stepped down from office about ten years ago.
I wish she would stop trying to continue to micro-manage the Town's affairs via the Circus Club which only subverts a healthier process of governance, and that she will please find some more productive venue for indulging her old grievance against McKiethen.
Posted by peter carpenter, a resident of the Atherton: Lindenwood neighborhood, on May 17, 2011 at 2:39 pm peter carpenter is a member (registered user) of Almanac Online
From: Peter Carpenter
Date: May 15, 2011 11:58:05 AM PDT
Dear Council Members,
I realize that there is widespread opposition to the proposed increases in refuse and recycling rates but I would add a contrary view - the increases are not nearly enough to cover the actual costs which the Town will eventually have to pay.
Under the current multi-year contract Recology is essentially guaranteed its costs plus a profit. There is no way that the proposed rates will cover the cost of the services being provided and the Town will be forced to make up the difference. At this point I suspect that you feel that there is no alternative but to approve the new rate schedule but I hope that if you do so that you also go on record that these rates are insufficient to cover the actual costs and that the Town will be forced to pay the shortfall via the truing-up clause in the contract.
Posted by Alice, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on May 18, 2011 at 6:30 am
The Council needs to recognize that funding for the Town Center will come from a wide variety of constituents. Former political leaders still have supporters. These community leaders can either work for or against the Town's desire to fund raise for the new Town Center or renew the parcel tax.
Wasn't Peter Carpenter advocating no anonymous donations at one point? Now, Widmer & McKeithen suggest it be done out of public view.
The bottom line is the Town has a financial problem. Private funding for capital improvements or operational needs is part of the solution.
The effort by these two Council members may have unintended consequences.
Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of the Atherton: Lindenwood neighborhood, on May 18, 2011 at 6:39 am
Alice asks:"Wasn't Peter Carpenter advocating no anonymous donations at one point?"
Yes, and I still do. Transparency is a much better solution than anonymity, however the Council should still reserve to itself the acceptance or rejection of any donation including any conditions imposed by the donor. We have a great, wealthy, civic minded community and individuals who wish to contribute to the Town's welfare without accruing any special privileges for themselves should be encouraged to do so.
Posted by Ed, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on May 18, 2011 at 1:35 pm
I don't believe that it is true AT ALL that Widmere and Mckiethen seek to keep "private donations out of public view".
I believe instead that they are seeking a solution to the question of how the Town might accept contributions from individual residents without creating an environment that might continue to raise questions about special treatment for those contributors. After all, special gifts to the Building Dept and Police Dept with far too much ensuing litigation as a consequence, would appear to explain the financial problems that Town is experiencing today.
The town is so small that trying to keep designated gifts to specific departments anonymous would be impossible.
My suggestion would be that all gifts be given ONLY to the Town in general, and then be distributed ONLY according to City Council designation, by unanimous vote (NOT committee), and according to need--other wise the money should remain in a general, and YES ANONYMOUS fund.