Posted by Ed, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on Jun 15, 2011 at 5:23 pm
Peter--we are lucky that tell us any thing anymore and by the way, that we even have an audit committee again--please remember that it was disbanded for at least a year there to punish the entire committee membership for supporting the previous finance director and his audit report. By the way what's the meeting time and place time and place please?
Posted by Business As Usual, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on Jun 15, 2011 at 9:18 pm
I guess every meeting is "special" when the committee has no standing calendar. More of the same smoke filled room policy making that is so endemic to this town. The council espouses transparency, but plays fast and loose with the Brown Act''s 72 hour notification when it suits its purposes.
Posted by Business As Usual, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on Jun 25, 2011 at 8:07 pm
No, the "public" wasn't there. Apparently, with 24 hours notice, nobody attended. The council decries the Town's apathy. When they hold a meeting with just 24 hours notice on a work day, they aren't exactly encouraging involvement, are they?
To your question, the committee did ask one of the attendees to leave the room. And, when they started discussing personnel matters, they turned off the recorder.
Where's the sunshine? Wasn't the Brown Act meant to stop this kind of activity?
The Audit Committee called a last minute, inconvenient meeting. They probably knew nobody would show. Then, they intentionally turned off the recording so nobody would know what they did.
Posted by punchbowl, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on Jun 26, 2011 at 7:22 am
I did not listen to the entire meeting but it sounds like the punchbowl was out and collectively they were having a party. Certainly not the decorum one would expect with the Mayor and Vice-Mayor present in dealing with important Town matters. It is really a glimpse into how the Town is being, run and it is not encouraging if this is the best they can do. Many comments made sound seem to indicate the some members of the committee are arrogant, full of themselves and flippant.
Perhaps the last words on the recording, "shouldn't we turn this thing off" as they begin to work over poor Louise Ho in a non-agendized meeting seem to be clearly a violation of the Brown Act but more importantly very poor taste.
Posted by Ed, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on Jun 28, 2011 at 12:27 am
I know that the APD has lately been video taping the Council Meetings for it's officers to view later on line, but how are they getting the audio recordings of Town committee meetings at which only committee members were in attendance-like this Audit Committee Meeting?
I hope that the City Clerk is not lending the APOA the only original copy of any meeting audio recordings, and that the APOA is required to follow the same protocol as the general public -by purchasing copies made only on formal request and only legally made by the City Clerk.
Unfortunately I have to say that the Council Meeting audio on the video made by the APD did not always match my own clear memory of some of the statements made by residents, all of whom were off camera and therefore pretty easy to edit out.