Posted by Is it possible, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on Dec 28, 2011 at 9:45 am
There are a number of details coming out regarding moving the library to the park that give concerns.
1. The current main house is less than 3,800 square feet and houses offices, workshops, the art committee, a staff kitchen, a meeting room, rest rooms, and a storage room to support the park. Does the current Library in the park address the needs of where to re-locate these activites and how much space they will require? Will a 2,500 square foot building need to be built in the park to meet those needs? Who will pay for the new building? Shouldn't the council put this on the agenda and discuss with the residents their plan? Is there a plan? Or do they want to first put in the new library building then come back to the residents and advise more space is needed needed for library walkways, patios, and to replace the existing facilities?
2. How much actual land space does the current library actually consume? There are outdoor gardens, a reading park, and a picnic area.
Is is possible to make these major changes and have the new library still meet the needs that gave reason to building a new library building? The County's and Library Committee's initial reports are that it needs a building 11,000 to 15,000 square feet plus patio, gardens, and walkways to meet the needs of those served by the Atherton Library.
How can the Atherton Council now decide that the total project including patio, gardens, and walkways can be done in less then 10,000 square feet and still meet the space needs for more area? Is this just to get the project approved?
If the plan is just to add 2,000 square feet of building space, why not just remodel the exisitng facility.
Posted by Mr Linden P Wood, a resident of the Atherton: Lindenwood neighborhood, on Dec 30, 2011 at 11:17 am
I agree . if not adding any additional space, why not just remodel completely the existing facility at the current location, saving the park from all crowds, cars, parking, and exhaust fumes? Or, why not go underground more in the new park location . . and put parking, additional space in basement (adding storage, archives, etc). That seems to be the hip way to go in Atherton . . subterranean baby!
Posted by Neighbor, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on Dec 30, 2011 at 12:47 pm
I sent my comments in regarding the scoping of the EIR. It is supposed to give pros and cons of other locations for the library, including its current location, and a new location near the Town Center.
Unless it has already been pre-determined that the EIR will conclude that the library is the best spot, why are all these changes to Master Plans, and setting of parameters for the library in the park, being made now? It certainly makes me wonder whether the EIR will truly be an un-biased review of the alternatives.
Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of the Atherton: Lindenwood neighborhood, on Jan 1, 2012 at 5:22 pm
Given the contentiousness of this issue IF the EIR is not an un-biased review of the alternatives then it will be challenged and undoubtedly will be ruled as inadequate. The time and cost of a second EIR would be considerable.
All concerned would be wise to approach this project with very careful attention to process as any mis-steps in the process will be used to derail whatever alternative is pursued. Hidden agendas will not stay hidden, prohibited serial meetings will be exposed and inappropriate use of library funds will be quickly uncovered.