Town Square

Post a New Topic

Tonight: Irrigating country club golf course

Original post made on Mar 20, 2012

Although you wouldn't necessarily know it from the title of the agenda item, the Menlo Park Environmental Quality Commission will review a proposal tonight to put a well in a city park to irrigate the Sharon Heights Golf and Country Club.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, February 1, 2012, 8:18 AM

Comments (2)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Park Neighbor
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Mar 20, 2012 at 10:18 am

What about all the money the water district will lose from one of their largest customers?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Mar 20, 2012 at 10:51 am

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

The law requires that that agenda description be more specific:

"The purpose of the brief general description is to inform interested members of the
public about the subject matter under consideration so that they can determine whether
to monitor or participate in the meeting of the body. In Carlson v. Paradise Unified
School Dist. (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 196, the court interpreted the agenda requirements
set forth in section 966 of the Education Code. That section required ". . . [a] list of
items that will constitute the agenda for all regular meetings shall be posted. . . ."
(Carlson v. Paradise Unified School Dist. (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 196, 199.) In
interpreting this section, the court stated:
"In the instant case, the school board's agenda contained as one
item the language 'Continuation school site change.' This was entirely
inadequate notice to a citizenry which may have been concerned over
a school closure.
"On this point alone, we think the trial court was correct
because the agenda item, though not deceitful, was entirely misleading
and inadequate to show the whole scope of the board's intended plans.
It would have taken relatively little effort to add to the agenda that this
'school site change' also included the discontinuance of elementary
education at Canyon View and the transfer of those students to
Ponderosa School." (Carlson v. Paradise Unified School Dist. (1971)
18 Cal.App.3d 196, 200, original emphasis; see also 67
Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 84, 87 (1984).)


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 3,193 views

Ode to Brussels Sprout
By Laura Stec | 20 comments | 2,474 views

Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,857 views

Charter School Proposal Steeped In Unintended Consequences
By Erin Glanville | 38 comments | 1,697 views

Measure M-- I am not drinking Greenheartís expensive potion
By Martin Lamarque | 8 comments | 434 views