Sign up for Express
New from the Almanac, Express is an e-edition delivered via email each weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Menlo Park, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   ATHERTON   FICTION
  MENLO PARK   MOVIES   OTHER TOPICS   PORTOLA VALLEY
  SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   THE LOCAL DISH   WOODSIDE
  REPORTERS' BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MESSAGE BOARD VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Memos reveal details of Menlo's downtown plan
Menlo Park, posted by Editor, The Almanac Online, on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:11 pm

Refinements in the long-range plan that will govern development in downtown Menlo Park and along El Camino Real for the next 30 years will be released by the city on Thursday afternoon, April 19, when it publishes the environmental impact report and final draft of the El Camino Real/Downtown Specific Plan in preparation for Planning Commission discussion on Monday, April 30.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, April 16, 2012, 8:19 PM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by Frugal, a resident of the Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park neighborhood, on Apr 17, 2012 at 5:11 pm

FIVE LEVELS? I wonder how many residents know this?

■ Parking garage in Plaza 2. The memo says a parking structure on Parking Plaza 2 could provide between 250 and 310 parking spaces, depending on whether part of the parcel is left as a small park. The five-level structure would replace 95 existing spaces, with one level underground.


Posted by Menlo Voter, a resident of the Menlo Park: other neighborhood, on Apr 17, 2012 at 8:16 pm

Do we want a vital downtown like Palo Alto or not? If we don't, then leave things as they are. If we want a vital downtown with a lot of business IT REQUIRES PARKING. Palo Alto realized this long ago and has built numerous parking garages. Do we want a vital downtown (like Palo Alto)? If the answer is "yes," we need to take the steps necessary to accomplish that. If not, then we can remain an antiquated little village that looks like it is still in the 60's. Menlo Park, you have a choice.


Posted by Frugal, a resident of the Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park neighborhood, on Apr 17, 2012 at 8:57 pm

The question is not do we want a "vital downtown like Palo Alto" but do we want to LOOK LIKE downtown Palo Alto. I for one like our downtown pretty much as is. (Except for El Camino where we can all agree that as soon as financing once again becomes available responsible development should follow.)


Posted by Marcy Magatelli, a resident of the Menlo Park: Downtown neighborhood, on Apr 17, 2012 at 9:25 pm

Is it just me, or do other people have trouble remembering which parking lot has which number? In the interest of really making sure everyone affected, really does understand everything about these plans, it might be nice to see pictures, diagrams, examples, etc. Something people can quickly identify. My own store's parking lot is one that got assigned to be available for extra time, for pay, but I didn't even know where the dumb meter was, to show people where to buy a ticket! If you are like me, we really do care, but we don't have a lot of time to devote to all this, so please make it really clear and simply. Thanks!


Posted by Menlo Voter, a resident of the Menlo Park: other neighborhood, on Apr 18, 2012 at 7:18 am

Frugal:

Santa Cruz Ave. storefronts are desperately in need of updating. Like I said, it's like stepping back inot the 60's along much of the street.

As far as ECR is concerned, most of the vacant land is owned by Stanford. I don't think financing is an issue with them. The economy perhaps.


Posted by concerned, a resident of the Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park neighborhood, on Apr 18, 2012 at 8:05 am

Stanford has ground leases that haven't expired yet. And they are waiting to see how big they can build under the new rules.

Is anyone else concerned that the consultants who just concluded that mixed-use buildings (unless residential) on Stanford couldn't provide any public benefit are the same consultants who are also employed by Stanford?


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

AlmanacNews.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.