Town Square

Post a New Topic

Sequoia Healthcare District subsidy of Nursing Program

Original post made by Jack Hickey, Woodside: Emerald Hills, on Apr 20, 2012

This story contains 444 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (8)

Like this comment
Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Apr 21, 2012 at 1:08 pm

Jack, Is there anymore information re: "This could have avoided the situation where 9 nurses subsidized by the District taxpayers took their newly acquired skills to Palm Springs."

This is always going to be a challenge for San Mateo County. We educate them with taxpayer money and they leave....

Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Apr 21, 2012 at 8:28 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Individual taxpayers should decide if we want to make charitable contributions rather than letting this defunct 'hospital' take our tax money and do with it as they wish.

Like this comment
Posted by Jack Hickey
a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Apr 23, 2012 at 10:13 am

Michael, for the District's spin on the Nursing Program as presented to the Board at it's 1June 2011 meeting, see: Web Link
Information for that meeting, including minutes, is not accessible on the Districts website. Web Link
At the August 3, 2011 meeting, I requested corrections to the minutes:
"With respect to the Nursing Program Status Update under June 1 minutes, Director Hickey said they were incorrect as the program did not meet all its benchmark goals regarding employment of nursing graduates working within the District. Mr. Michelson replied that there is no employment benchmark for the program.
Motion: To approve the June 1 minutes amended to add comment that Director Hickey stated that there should be a benchmark as to the number of student nurses hired within the District.
By: Director Kane
Seconded by: Director Faro
Roll Call Vote: 4-1-0 Director Hickey opposed
Motion Passed"
NOTABLE: From the Draft minutes, it was reported that "One hundred forty-three, nearly 53%, of graduates live and work in San Mateo County." ONLY 53%? What fraction of those work in the District which subsidized their education?

Anyone with the time and inclination to listen to the tapes of these meetings can do so at the District Office. You will hear Art Faro suggesting that no benchmark is necessary.
I have repeatedly requested that those tapes be digitized and made accessible on the District website.

Like this comment
Posted by Eric Saund
a resident of another community
on Apr 23, 2012 at 10:24 am

Wouldn't it be easy to put handcuffs on the funding? To get the money you pledge to work in San Mateo for four years if jobs are available there. Otherwise you are obligated to pay the money back.

Like this comment
Posted by Jack Hickey
a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Apr 23, 2012 at 10:31 am

Initial approval of the Nursing Program is contained in the minutes for the 16 Dec 2003 meeting at: Web Link
In addition to the $1,000,000/year subsidy, there was an initial start-up expense of $650,000.

Like this comment
Posted by Jack Hickey
a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Apr 23, 2012 at 10:58 am

Eric, if the nurses work within the District, the beneficiary would be the hospital for which they work. They should either make the original $25,000 loan (my preference) or assume responsibility for repayment. Ideally, the nurses who are the primary beneficiaries, should pay back the loans. (to the unions)

Like this comment
Posted by Jack Hickey
a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Apr 24, 2012 at 12:47 am

I received from Sequoia Healthcare District CEO Lee Michelson, a paper copy of the "Memorandum of Understanding" (MOU) regarding the Nursing Program. I have requested that it be made available on the District website.

Section 9, paragraph h calls for a review of program status after the 5th class has been admitted, and refers to criteria (aka benchmarks)for keeping the program in effect for the full 10 years. "...and, (iii) the Hospital's employment rate of program graduates is acceptable to SHCD."

An updated review showed that from 2008-2011, only 55 out of ~160 graduates were hired or being considered for hiring by the Hospital. And, as previously reported, only 53% of graduates live and work in San Mateo County.
Is that acceptable? Apparently the majority of the SHCD Board thinks it is.

Like this comment
Posted by Jack Hickey
a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Dec 8, 2012 at 9:55 am

An update is now at: Web Link

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Tava Kitchen shutters in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 15 comments | 10,745 views

By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 588 views