Town Square

Post a New Topic

Guest opinion: More than chutzpah in recent letter

Original post made on Sep 2, 2008

Chutzpah — (Yiddish) brazen imprudence, gall.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 12:00 AM

Comments (5)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by NIMBY Alert
a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
on Sep 2, 2008 at 10:28 pm

This op-ed piece is so personal and so nasty, it surprises me that the Almanac would print it. I would have preferred an article by the Almanac addressing the issues that Winkler raised in her letter. Was this closed session publicly noticed in a proper fashion or was it added to the agenda without an identifying topic?

Because it's election season again, It might be a good time to put a hold on the nastiness. Morris, your op-ed piece could have been stronger had you simply denied your participation. As it is, you and Mr. Engel who live close to the train tracks wanted the council to join the lawsuit against high speed rail. Just as the other letter writer Nancy Barnaby wanted. The fact that the claim in the lawsuit pertains to the route and has nothing to do with the concerns raised by you and your neighbors speaks volumes of your lack of vision.

I understand your personal fear but really, do you think this state-wide project is going to be stopped by one neighborhood, even if you do have a strange power hold on this council? Council member Fergusson may have voted to join the lawsuit for political reasons but when she got to the regional board, City and County Association of Governments and faced a vote to support the High Speed Rail Bond measure, she played it smart and abstained. The safe Jellins method of dancing lightly when facing a difficult tune.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Way To Go!
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 3, 2008 at 11:31 am

"This op-ed piece is so personal and so nasty, it surprises me that the Almanac would print it."

Ms. Winkler fully deserved it and I salute both Mr. Brown for writing it and the Almanac for publishing it!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by way to go, NOT!
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 4, 2008 at 11:08 pm

Mr. Brown appears to be proud that he got 2 million dollars from the developer. He might have, IF the project ever gets built. But a fair accounting of the impact of his action should include the public dollars LOST because of the two plus years of delay. The biggest loser was our city's schools, both the impact fees and the real estate taxes not paid. The city lost the commercial taxes, business and sales tax. The Parks department lost about 900,000 dollars in Rec-in-lieu fees due to the unit reduction count, 135 to 108.

WAY TO GO, MORRIS! You make our town a really special place!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by hooray for morris
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 4, 2008 at 11:19 pm

Don't bring the schools into this. The schools don't want more homes built because they are already bursting at the seams and because the amount paid in property taxes doesn't begin to cover the cost of each additional student. Morris is a hero for trying to minimize the project's impact. We will all have to live with whatever is built for a long time.

According to the shortsided reasoning of the above poster, we should be cramming 100 or more units onto every acre so as to increase in lieu fees and taxes. That kind of logic would only spell doom for our city.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by way to go, NOT!
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 5, 2008 at 8:56 am

Okay, if crowded schools are an issue, then the original Derry proposal with more units but smaller units is BETTER than the Morris Brown design with fewer but larger units. Larger units means more families with kids can buy their way into Menlo Park.

Apparently "hooray" wants the borders of Menlo Park to be closed. Only the elite are allowed; the riff raff should move to the East Bay, pave over farmland, build new highways, then clog them. Menlo Park is closed. Hooray has no knowledge of history, this town once had many more kids than today, every block full of playing kids. With the end of baby boom, many schools closed. We now have smaller families, and these families are the future of Menlo Park. Our refusal to accommodate them is to deny our future.

Full disclosure, I'm one of the new families and have no problem paying $big$ dollars for a new home. We should have more than ethnic diversity, we should have economic diversity too! I want my kid's teachers to be able to live here.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

It Can Wait
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 2,754 views

Hit the Bus
By Paul Bendix | 3 comments | 329 views

“I live near Sunset”
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 52 views