Ethics Hearings Part Two
Original post made by stunned yet again on Oct 16, 2010
For next Wednesday's Atherton Council Meeting, the closed session agenda shows the first item of litigation to be discussed as being yet another lawsuit from Peninsula Pacific Group against the Town, but this time naming "50 John Does" who are to be added to their claim. I can't even tell by the notice what they might be suing for this time around. Does the Almanac know or care to find out?
[Portion removed; personal attack.]
Could the Town end up in receivership to PPG if they keep this up? Or do they own us already and we just haven't figured it out yet?
If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Services, Dining and Shopping Downtown in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 16 comments | 1,941 views
Handmade truffle shop now open in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 1,558 views
Separate Entrances for BMR and Market Rate Apartments?
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 167 views