Town Square

Post a New Topic

What Constitutes a "Personal Attack?"

Original post made by POGO, Woodside: other, on Oct 17, 2010

Those who pay attention to The Almanac's Town Square website have witnessed a disturbing trend during the past few weeks. The trend I reference is the increasing number of so-called personal attacks and bashing by posters.

This story contains 576 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (6)

Like this comment
Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Oct 17, 2010 at 11:01 am

Pogo,

There is also another element/twist to the negative postings, that is sometimes posters are using other posters names which has happened to me and I see Peter has just had it happen to him.

We are all learning how to use this form of communication, I'm thrilled it is available, it has saved an Atherton woman's life, even with its flaws.


Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Oct 17, 2010 at 11:09 am

I think that it is worth noting that those topics which devolve to personal attacks are seldom, in total, very productive. I also note that 99% of the personal attacks come from a very small number of unregistered anonymous posters. Perhaps the editors will consider restrict all posting to registered users.


Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Oct 17, 2010 at 12:48 pm

Menlo Voter is a registered user.

I find myself agreeing more and more with Mr. Carpenter the more time I spend on this forum. I agree that it would probably cut down on a lot of the garbage posts if a poster had to be registrered. I still don't agree they should have to use their true name. If registered, the editor knows who these people are and if they repeatedly violate the terms of agreement they can be barred from further participation.


Like this comment
Posted by peter carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Oct 18, 2010 at 12:31 am

peter carpenter is a registered user.

I think a suitable compromise would be to require all posters to be registered while still allowing those registered users to use an anonymous names - but only one name per user so that posters can develop source credibility, or lack thereof.


Like this comment
Posted by stevlevin
a resident of Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
on Oct 18, 2010 at 2:21 pm

stevlevin is a registered user.

I think it's an intriguing dilemma: How to encourage free and open, yet responsible communication? I see pros and cons with either extreme: (a) allow anyone to post anything anonymously, or (b) allow posts only registered users who have a confirmed identity (at least confirmed to the webhost.)

Perhaps a creative solution is to offer 2 levels of participation:
- If you login to your account and confirm your identity, your post appears with a certain background color, or marker, or in a separate section
- If you post without logging in, your message is posted with a different background or in a section reserved for anonymous posters.

This allows everyone to participate at the level of their choosing...and gives the reader the option of assigning more weight to the identified users.

Any support or upgrades to this idea, please?


Like this comment
Posted by R.GORDON
a resident of another community
on Oct 18, 2010 at 4:22 pm

R.GORDON is a registered user.

I dislike blatant attacks by those who have no means of defending themselves against people who group themselves and are "regulars" here daily and are almost too "clubby". Those who resort to anger and name calling do it out of frustration because they find this entire Peninsula thinks their sheds don't stink.
This is a very old fashioned snobbish and snotty area to those who are just regular people and who may not have the education or travel experience to deal with your own attacks with your finesse.
Personally, I would like to really let a few selfish and self serving elitists really "get it" once in a while.
Frankly, I have lived worldwide and known some of the most intriguing people in the world but never was intimidated by good manners or an occasional scathing wit. But, the majority of the ALMANAC snobs do not think much of "average" citizens and it is apparent when I see some of the attitudes here and in public.I also resent even more, the lack of participation of the "younger" voices who are very much against many of the ideas posted here. I get to be around many of the areas young crowds through my own family and their opinions are vastly different than most of their parents and the "older generation" who think they have all of the ideas based on old rules and old laws.They will, for the most part, make this area their own homes.These young also have a deeper involvement with people of the world and tend to have great humor......they can be "funny/rude" in a way not meant to hurt....at least, most of those I have met.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


To post your comment, please login or register at the top of the page. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Mountain View's Liquid Menu is reborn as The Phoenix
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 1,851 views

Some Impacts of Driverless Cars
By Steve Levy | 17 comments | 1,755 views

Abruzzo for Work, Amelia for Family, Rome for Love
By Laura Stec | 6 comments | 1,467 views

How are Exotic Animal Training and Learning in Marriage Related?
By Chandrama Anderson | 3 comments | 1,292 views

No Plans
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 479 views