Posted by Michael G. Stogner, a resident of another community, on Nov 19, 2010 at 7:22 am

The WAMP was good will it lasted.

You will recall the articles: from October 1-7-2010

Sequoia Healthcare District Board Race Raises Disturbing Questions.

Candidate Questions Legality of Taxation.

From October 8-15-2010 This is the hard to find article because up to 1200 copies were removed from the distribution boxes first night.

VOTERS BEING DENIED RIGHTS BY SEQUOIA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT?

Good luck to The Paper

Posted by Michael G. Stogner, a resident of another community, on Nov 19, 2010 at 12:45 pm

Web Link

Two good, hard to find WAMP articles on the Grand Jury Report of 00-01.

Posted by Tingling With Anticipation, a resident of the Menlo Park: other neighborhood, on Nov 19, 2010 at 4:01 pm

OK - there's one hardcore WAMP reader out there tingling with anticipation for "The Paper" - so who's with "Michael G. Stogner"???

Posted by Joe, a resident of the Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park neighborhood, on Nov 19, 2010 at 4:20 pm

Not I.

Call me crazy, but I am skeptical of a publication with a name so amorphous, so presumptuous, so full of, I don't know, misplaced brio as to refer to itself as if it were already an institution.

And if they actually used a word like brio, that would be another reason not to read it.

Posted by Cheryl J., a resident of the Menlo Park: Fair Oaks neighborhood, on Nov 20, 2010 at 5:34 am

The Wamp did more harm than good for their advertisers. It was so amateur that it made me question the professionalism of realtors like Michael Dreyfus and Mary Gullixson who were heavily sponsoring it. I'd be furious if they had advertised a house I was selling in the Wamp!!!