Town Square

Post a New Topic

Portola Valley council rejects Cargill development

Original post made on Dec 14, 2010

The Cargill Salt Corp. proposal for a residential community on a salt flat off Redwood City should instead be restored as home for creatures that lived there before it was a salt flat, the Portola Valley Town Council said in resolution adopted on Dec. 8.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, December 14, 2010, 8:45 AM

Comments (6)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Advocate for Nature
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Dec 14, 2010 at 1:29 pm

FIVE STARS GOES TO PORTOLA VALLEY'S COUNCIL FOR THEIR WISDOM!!! The bay belongs to the creatures that call it home, and to all of us. The Cargill project must not be built based on the greed of those who would profit from it.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gene Chaput
a resident of Portola Valley: Westridge
on Dec 14, 2010 at 4:46 pm

Great. Way to go PV Town Council. We're behind you 100%. What a nice Christmas present.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by larry
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Dec 16, 2010 at 7:01 pm

It's Redwood City's decision. It doesn't matter what PV wants or doesn't want.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 16, 2010 at 8:11 pm

"It's Redwood City's decision. It doesn't matter what PV wants or doesn't want."
[Portion removed, terms of use.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 16, 2010 at 9:14 pm

"It's Redwood City's decision. It doesn't matter what PV wants or doesn't want."

[Portion removed. Terms of use.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Curmudgeon
a resident of another community
on Dec 30, 2010 at 12:07 pm

At a time when thousands of people are *still* commuting into local jobs from as far away as Modesto and Stockton, spewing who knows how much car exhaust and wasting precious natural resources (most notably Time, the most precious and finite resource any of us have) the myopia of a good many "environmentalists" is stupefying.

To say nothing of how many critters were displaced by development out in the remote San Joaquin Valley, rather than here in an already urbanized area.

In short, fill in the swamps, let another Foster City bloom, and give your children (and by extension your granchildren) a chance to live near you, rather than many miles away.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 2,847 views

WUE makes out-of-state tuition more affordable
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 2 comments | 2,750 views

Ode to Brussels Sprout
By Laura Stec | 14 comments | 2,334 views

Charter School Proposal Steeped In Unintended Consequences
By Erin Glanville | 38 comments | 1,600 views

Measure M-- I am not drinking Greenheartís expensive potion
By Martin Lamarque | 7 comments | 309 views