Town Square

Post a New Topic

Public Trust or Private Security

Original post made by Secret Santa on Dec 15, 2010

There were already three different council meetings scheduled for tonight Wednesday
12-15-10. A Special meeting, a Closed Session, and the Regular council meeting.
Today at the last minute, a fourth and separate meeting has been added to the list.

In the spirit of Christmas and reciprocity, the Police Department wants a special forum to acknowledge yet another lavishly inappropriate gift from a grateful resident--this time it's a check for 60,000$ worth of updated computers for our two patrol cars. Last month it was another Police Dog, I believe a new vehicle before that, and then of course there is the "scholarship" program...
I don't know if any of this is legal or not but it can't possibly be healthy in a democratic society.
The town doesn't need to even bother to schedule Council meetings at all if we are just signing off on oligarchy.
The Police Department should not be undermining democratic process or the elected council by soliciting gifts from wealthy residents. A park or a Library maybe but not the Police--it's wrong!

Comments (9)

Posted by Jon Buckheit, a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Dec 15, 2010 at 10:48 am

I think the gesture of making this gift was an enormously benevolent act on the part of the donors and they should only be praised and not be criticized for it.

But, It is INCREDIBLY POOR GOVERNANCE for the Town of Atherton to accept directed donations to individual departments that service residents.

The council should have the courage to respectfully decline this donation and ask that it be instead submitted to the Town of Atherton so the council can decide how to allocate it.

Is this any different than an individual donation being made to the building department? Would that be accepted? What would happen if that homeowner started a remodel the following year?

I think the Town of Atherton is or should be moving toward more transparency and governance for its police department, not less.

I don't buy any argument that this gift is for the department and not for individual officers. We all know the department is under enormous financial pressure, and that the individual officers fear outsourcing and other cutbacks. This takes that pressure off so Guerra doesn't have to go to the council asking for more money for equipment, which would just underscore the financial problems.

This type of individual directed donation would not be tolerated in any well-run city in the United States, including New York City.


Posted by Secret Santa, a resident of Atherton: other
on Dec 15, 2010 at 1:23 pm

This is Santa again, I am the only one who should be keeping a Naughty or Nice list.
If I found out that any of my elves were receiving gifts instead of making them, I would cancel Christmas.
The legacy of the Buckheit case should not be that for a donation of 60,000$, residents can hope for due process when they call the APD for assistance. This is not an auction--the value is a set price of 10,000,000 with the check made payable only to me.
S. Claus


Posted by deal maker, a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Dec 15, 2010 at 4:43 pm

Will someone please give Jon Buckheit the $10 million he's demanding in his federal civil rights case so we don't have to receive near daily reminders of how corrupt and inefficient our police department is?


Posted by tolerance, a resident of Atherton: other
on Dec 15, 2010 at 5:04 pm

Jon: here is program that tolerates individual directed contributions in a neighboring community of Los Gatos/Monte Serreno. It is a common practice across the country for citizens to do who care about their police agency. Get used to it here in Atherton. Perhaps you could just add this compalint to your lawsuit if you think you rights have been violated.

Web Link


Posted by Bill Avery, a resident of Atherton: West of Alameda
on Dec 15, 2010 at 6:46 pm

I'll be more impressed with Guerra when holds officers like DeVlught responsible for falsifying police reports.

A $60,000 donation for police equipment won't even be a down payment on the Town's lawyers bills in the Buckheit case, much less the settlement they'll have to pay him.


Posted by Menlo Voter, a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 15, 2010 at 8:03 pm

Deal Maker:

I assume from your comment you'd rather stick your head in the sand and pretend you don't have a police department with serious problems?


Posted by Secret Santa, a resident of Atherton: other
on Dec 16, 2010 at 4:27 pm

The difference in giving money for a public park or library or even to a university ,
and giving money to armed public safety officers, is in the potential for influence and abuse of discretionary authority.
A gift to your local library would not likely influence your place on a waiting list for a popular book. A gift of a clock or fountain to a local park would not effect the time displayed to the donor, or who got splashed by the water's spray.
Writing a speeding ticket for a driver who paid for the pencil and pad could get awkward.
Deciding wether or not to cite donor or non donor residents is something no one should ever have to consider, especially the police.
Residents might keep an attorney on retainer if they choose but not public safety officers.


Posted by court jester, a resident of Atherton: West of Alameda
on Dec 16, 2010 at 6:33 pm

The ironic and sarcastic comment by deal maker sums it up nicely.

Far too many of my nieighbors wish Jon Buckheit would just go away. Apparently a significant majority of those living in Atherton would rather wrap themselves in a blanket of ignorance and feel a sense of false security than they would see our department for what it is, an ugly corrupt beast that cannot be tamed, that must be destroyed.

I'm not a radical. I just believe in law and order.

Guerra probably thinks he did the Town a favor by getting a $60,000 donation. I think not. Guerra just shows how cheaply he can be bought.


Posted by Secret Santa, a resident of Atherton: other
on Dec 16, 2010 at 6:54 pm

Court Jester--could you repost the scoop on the interim City manager candidate from Elk Grove--(Daneilson I think)? The link to to Sacramento newspaper article no longer works.
There was some sort of big grand jury investigation scandal, but I can't remember what.
This guy is about to get the appointment


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Breastfeeding Tips
By Jessica T | 10 comments | 1,240 views

Who Says Kids Donít Eat Vegetables?
By Laura Stec | 6 comments | 1,095 views

Community Service Helps You, Too
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 837 views

Weekly Update
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 762 views

Separate Entrances for BMR and Market Rate Apartments?
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 448 views