Sign up for Express
New from the Almanac, Express is an e-edition delivered via email each weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Menlo Park, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   ATHERTON   FICTION
  MENLO PARK   MOVIES OTHER TOPICS   PORTOLA VALLEY
  SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   THE LOCAL DISH   WOODSIDE
  REPORTERS' BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MAIN VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Letter: Get rid of Caltrain and bring in BART
Other Topics, posted by Editor, The Almanac Online, on Jan 4, 2012 at 4:02 pm

Regarding last week's excellent guest opinion by my colleagues Jim Janz and Mike Brady about Caltrain's survival, while I agree with their several premises, I don't agree with the most basic one. Caltrain has no business surviving, with or without high-speed rail.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, January 4, 2012, 12:00 AM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by Reality Check, a resident of another community, on Jan 4, 2012 at 4:02 pm

Despite Caltrain's flaws -- and there are many -- their ridership has been climbing for 16 straight months according to this story:

Web Link


Posted by Reality Check, a resident of another community, on Jan 4, 2012 at 4:14 pm

Oh, and BART's custom über-costly technology is a disaster. So while a management takeover could make sense, installing BART's cu$tom oddball track gauge and 1kV DC 3rd rails (forcing full grade-separation) in place of the existing Caltrain standard-gauge tracks would primarily benefit BART's construction contractors. Even with overhead electrification, Caltrain's design and tracks make grade separation optional, and do not require massive pedestrian-hostile battleship-sized stations floating in a sea of parking.


Posted by Observer, a resident of another community, on Jan 4, 2012 at 11:31 pm

BART along the peninsula is a wonderful idea. The thought of a 10 car train chugging along a 30-ft elevated railway along El Camino brings tears of joy to my eyes. Station stops would include Valparaiso Ave BART, Santa Cruz Ave BART, and Menlo Ave BART, Sand Hill Rd BART, University Ave BART, and many more. You can never have too many station stops. Of course we'd need parking for all of the BART commuters. I'd propose building a 50,000 spot capacity parking structure above Stanford University. In fact, we could just enclose the campus completely inside of a parking structure.

Naturally, we'd need a connector to Palo Alto Airport, so we'd have a cable-drawn mini BART run along elevated railway from Stanford BART over to the airport. It should get at least 1 or 2 riders a day.

That's our starting point, but I'm certainly open to future improvements, such as an EPA to Fremont under water tunnel, widening the BART track gauge to a more sensible 10 or 15 feet, slowing the absurdly high max speed of 80 to a more sensible 55, and replacing the seats with giant sponges soaked in urine.

Yes, BART and the Peninsula are a match made in heaven.


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

AlmanacNews.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.