Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Feb 16, 2012
"But Councilwoman Kathy McKeithen was clearly uncomfortable with the idea of destroying the records, especially when Chief Flint, responding to her questions, said that some of the records involved officers still on the force, and that storage space for the records wasn't a problem."
Since storage space isn't a problem, destroying 10 five-year-old cases involving citizen complaints or questionable behavior by officers that led to investigations, should be the last thing Chief Flint is interested in doing.
Transparency is the way to go.............good meeting
This shows nothing will ever be enough for Kathy McKeithen or John Buckheit. Even when they admit Ed Flint has made some really bad moves in the police department that they like, because of their vendetta against it, they still complain and want trivial complaints around forever. This isn't transparency, it's a vendetta.
Lets all HOPE that "Nothing ever enough" is not an Atherton Police Officer.
It is telling that Chief Flint notes: "the department is retaining some records that are older than five years because they involve an officer or officers he considers "problematic."
I am extremely glad that there now appears to be someone overseeing the department in a functional fashion, something that has been lacking in the past.
I wish there were more people like resident.
The issue has always been empowered citizen oversight of the Police Department.
The only people who look into their affairs are carefully selected members of their club, such as the Oakland officer, when Oakland PD is being looked at very hard by FBI and there is talk of direct intervention.
FBI has its eye on things here too, and there may yet remain an open investigation file on Dean, mightn't there.
Maybe the Council and the Citizenry will embrace their fear, move through the intimidating comments and actions and finally begin to do what is clearly necessary here, i.e. begin to truly work together with the force in openness, cooperation and true mutual respect. Officers are just people too, and so many are very good people. The real issue is the need for oversight, openness and recognition of the rights of and need for an empowered citizenry involved law enforcement affairs.
The big news here is that even after the recent "retirement" of one problem officer and the demotion of the problematic dispatch supervisor, Flint still acknowledges there are "problematic" officers in the APD.
How about the APD join the modern world and copy the reports onto a DVD or CD. That
would take up about 6 inches of space.
Or they could wait until they have the new 20,000 sq. ft. building. Then they would have plenty of room.
Col. Flint has already said that storage space is a non issue....plenty of space for these files.
I'm betting cops just don't want a running tally on their complaints and misbehavior.
Did no one pay attention to the fact that, in her own words at the council meeting, Kathy McKeithen stated that she got her ideas re retention of police records from watching "Law & Order?" Is this how our leaders develop realistic policies?
Doug, asks "Is this how our leaders develop realistic policies?"
There is a big difference between ideas and policies, according to you she got her ideas re:retention of police records from Law & Order.
Another idea she had was to ask a great question of Police Chief Ed. Flint, Is this a space issue for Atherton, How much space is required to maintain these records. The good news is it was not a space issue at all.
A blind and deaf man could see through this effort to cover up the past of ANY police files being destroyed.
Corruption is part of politics and protection which people defend in case their names are involved where they have escaped detection.
This is a perfect time to act because of the problems facing the entire COUNTY.
"A blind and deaf man could see through this effort to cover up the past of ANY police files being destroyed."
This entire process has been conducted with full public disclosure, scrutiny and comment - only the blind and the deaf would find basis for disapproval.
Our current Police Chief has consistently demonstrated a high standard of both conduct and disclosure - to suggest other wise is being blind and deaf.
Reasonable people do not throw out generalized accusations of corruption, so I agree with your comment resisting such characterization.
However, it is unclear what you mean by 'the entire process'. Could you clarify?
Also, is it not equally invalid through non-specific overstatement to characterize your opponent as 'deaf and blind'? Seems vague and imprecise and carries with it the sense of a rude tone.
Isn't it true also, that given the history of the department over the last 8 - 10 years, that such a request is at best imprudent given the environment? and in terms of public opinion, clearly 'sends the wrong message to the public' regarding the intention of the department to be exposed and culpable to those who employ them, i.e. The Citizens.
My best to you. And keep pluggin'. Its clear where your allegiances lie. And that does not appear to be with the interests of citizen empowerment and oversight of this department.
"characterize your opponent as 'deaf and blind'"
I carefully did not so characterize any individual - if the shoe fits....
" citizen empowerment and oversight of this department."
I heartily endorse both citizen empowerment and oversight of the police department.
This entire process was done was both full disclosure and opportunity for public oversight and comment.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Atherton: Lindenwood
- Atherton: Lloyden Park
- Atherton: other
- Atherton: West Atherton
- Atherton: West of Alameda
- Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
- Menlo Park: Belle Haven
- Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
- Menlo Park: Downtown
- Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
- Menlo Park: Felton Gables
- Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
- Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
- Menlo Park: other
- Menlo Park: Park Forest
- Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
- Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
- Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
- Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
- Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
- Menlo Park: The Willows
- Menlo Park: University Heights
- Portola Valley: Brookside Park
- Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
- Portola Valley: Ladera
- Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
- Portola Valley: other
- Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
- Portola Valley: Westridge
- Portola Valley: Woodside Highlands
- Woodside: Emerald Hills
- Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
- Woodside: Kings Mountain/Skyline
- Woodside: Mountain Home Road
- Woodside: other
- Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
- Woodside: Woodside Glens
- Woodside: Woodside Heights
- Woodside: Woodside Hills
- Belle Haven Elementary
- Corte Madera School
- Encinal School
- Hillview Middle School
- James Flood Magnet School
- La Entrada School
- Las Lomitas School
- Laurel School
- Menlo-Atherton High School
- Oak Knoll School
- Ormondale School
- Willow Oaks Elementary
- Woodside High School
- Woodside School
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Best High Dives to Watch the Game
By Laura Stec | 14 comments | 2,534 views
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,408 views
King of the Slides
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 1,094 views
Where the Sidewalk Ends
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 274 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Menlo Park
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
Mountain View Voice
© 2014 The Almanac
All rights reserved.