Hazards of reopening closed landfill
Original post made by Lennie Roberts on Oct 18, 2006
The Marsh Road landfill was not operated under today's strict standards. The South County Garbage and Refuse District allowed many hazardous materials <0x2014> household hazardous waste, industrial waste, municipal waste, old appliances, sewage sludge, even dead animals <0x2014> to be buried there.
Terracing Bayfront's hillsides to create level ball fields will trigger new regulatory agency requirements to control methane gas, storm water runoff, and toxic leachate (liquid landfill waste), and to monitor pollution of the Bay and the underground aquifer.
Each year, the city must extract over 6 million gallons of leachate that collects in an underground lake where the ball fields are proposed. The leachate is then pumped several miles to the sewage treatment plant in Redwood Shores.
After the El Nino storms of 1997-98, there was a major release of leachate in the vicinity of the proposed sports fields. Regulatory agencies will almost certainly require the city to increase the leachate pumping in order to protect players using the sports fields.
The city's estimates of $17 million for 17 acres of a sports complex would be just a down payment.
Voters should reject Measure J. Bayfront's modern-day Pandora's Box should not be re-opened.
(Lennie Roberts is the legislative advocate for the
Committee for Green Foothills.)
Smitten Ice Cream on its way to Los Altos Whole Foods
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 1,164 views
A Perspective on Surf Air Approaches to San Carlos
By Stuart Soffer | 17 comments | 935 views
Common Core And The Literary Classics: Supplementing Our Kids Education (By An Avowed Jane Austenophile)
By Erin Glanville | 6 comments | 871 views