Town Square

Post a New Topic

Stirring it up in election season

Original post made by Brielle Johnck, Menlo Park: The Willows, on Oct 18, 2006

It's election season and that means politics 24-7. Admit it, we love it.
Promises are made. Blame is spread around in large quantities. The Almanac archives are searched for evidence of wrongdoing in years past. The insult de jour is that candidates or their supporters are behaving in ways that are labeled "political."
At the League of Women Voter's forum candidate Lee Duboc called the referendum on the Derry project a "political" move, presumably to stir up emotions during the campaign season. The legal window of opportunity to file an application for a referendum is specific and time sensitive. What would be the "political" advantage for taking on this arduous task at this time?
On the other hand, the Duboc/Boyle/Winkler Slate has placed on our November ballot Measure J that is absolutely unnecessary and presumably for the purpose of rousting their supporters and exploiting parents who are searching for additional playing fields.
The language on the ballot asks the voter if the city should have the option to put playing fields at Bayfront Park. What nonsense to ask such a question. The city has always had the option and the Slate had four years to conduct an environmental review to determine if such a proposal is even possible.
Talk about a cynical "political" ploy! This campaign strategy is costing taxpayers money, a clever subsidy to the Slate's election campaign. Candidate Duboc had over a decade while on the Parks and Recreation Commission to produce playing fields and she just didn't get to it. In 1992, the city had an opportunity to gain a field at St. Patrick's' Seminary as part of the development permit and Ms. Duboc could have lent her voice to the chorus of parents then asking the council to include a field in the 150-home deal.
Recently the Rosewood Hotel got the Slate's vote but no field. Ms. Duboc had her chance and the Slate let us down. We need new leadership.
Measure J should be defeated. Vote no on J.
Brielle Johnck


There are no comments yet. Please share yours below.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Coming soon: Fire Oak & Barley in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 2,677 views

Meditation Before Medication for Better Mental Health
By Chandrama Anderson | 11 comments | 1,679 views

The Saddle Room – A True Friend of Kids
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 1,465 views

July 27th: Colleges That Change Lives are Coming
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 3 comments | 1,421 views

Moving Away - becoming long-distance friends
By Cheryl Bac | 6 comments | 855 views