Town Square

Post a New Topic

Guest opinion: Heavy rail not the solution for regional transit needs

Original post made on Jul 21, 2007

Usually, I disagree with Henry Riggs. And usually I agree with the editorial positions of the Almanac. This time, it's the other way around. (Editorial and guest editorial, July 4, 2007)

This story contains 48 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (1)

Like this comment
Posted by Curious
a resident of another community
on Jul 21, 2007 at 6:42 am


Heavy rail "least appropriate for people moving"? Please elaborate, providing citations or examples, as appropriate. Also, please define precisely what you mean by heavy rail? Which of these are heavy rail (why or why not?):

BART
DC Metro
LA Red Line
LA Blue Line
NYC subway
LIRR
Metro North
Chicago Metro
Chicago El
Atlanta's MARTA
Paris RER and/or Metro
San Diego "Trolley"
London Tube

How about places, like in Karlsruhe, Germany, where LRVs share tracks with faster, long distance heavy rail trains for part of their route?

Web Link

Is that heavy rail or light rail? Thanks in advance for clearing all this up, and for filling us in on the bit about how heavy rail is least appropriate for moving people (would this include all the heavily-used trains in Japan too ... how about the Shinkansens or the French TGVs?)


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

French Laundry alums to open Palo Alto restaurant
By Elena Kadvany | 18 comments | 14,791 views

Water, baking soda, vinegar and slime
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 1,225 views

Peace Walk and Father's Grief Retreat
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 986 views