Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Aug 2, 2012
Caltrain ridership is soaring, which is good for revenue, but but trains are overflowing during rush hour. Paying passengers are being turned away. What is Caltrain doing to increase capacity during commute hours? If full trains become the norm and passengers cannot count on getting on the trains, then large numbers will just start driving again and abandon Caltrain for good. Adding off-hour trains may be useful to some people, but the vast majority of train riders don't have huge amounts of flexibility in their work schedules.
Dear full trains: It's a great question and we are, indeed, worried about the overcrowding on trains and the impact on our customers. That's why we will be adding six trains, as the story notes. Hopefully, that will give people more options and relieve some the pressure on peak-hour trains.
Thanks for riding Caltrain.
Executive Officer for Public Affairs
Good new for passing new mile stone of 50000 weekday ridership. As we know Caltrain electrification happens as early as 2019, how Caltrain will handle the pressure of increasing demand? We are OK with crowded train if Caltrain have short term strategy. I am afraid if Caltrain have plan no improvement until 2019.
Hi Caltrain commuter -- our ability to add service will depend almost entirely on funding. We are adding six trains in the fall largely because of increased revenues due to the record ridership. But four of those trains are restoring service we cut a year ago when we had a large budget deficit. Another economic downturn and we could be facing the same kind of cuts. Indeed, Caltrain does not have a permanent, dedicated source of funding and we need to solve that problem or the railroad will always be financially precarious. So, to directly answer your question, we have plans for financial stability and from those we will plan service improvements, but it's all contingent on solving the budget problems.
Thanks for being a Caltrain commuter.
Executive Officer for Public Affairs
I appreciate Mark Simon's (Caltrain) thoughtful comments to earlier postings.
Re increasing service during rush hours, would it be better to increase the number of cars, from 5 to 6, rather than adding trains. It seems like it would be more efficient in energy and labor.
I think there is an issue that not all stations are long enough to accommodate a longer train. However, most I've been to do seem to have adequate length, and perhaps the 6th car might not open its doors at the shorter stations and have signage showing which stations it stops at (perhaps in green) and which not (red).
Longer trains do nothing to rebuild the gap in local train service during peak commute times. The baby bullets are great for longer hauls, but without local routing between them, their usability is limited.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Atherton: Lindenwood
- Atherton: Lloyden Park
- Atherton: other
- Atherton: West Atherton
- Atherton: West of Alameda
- Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
- Menlo Park: Belle Haven
- Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
- Menlo Park: Downtown
- Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
- Menlo Park: Felton Gables
- Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
- Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
- Menlo Park: other
- Menlo Park: Park Forest
- Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
- Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
- Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
- Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
- Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
- Menlo Park: The Willows
- Menlo Park: University Heights
- Portola Valley: Brookside Park
- Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
- Portola Valley: Ladera
- Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
- Portola Valley: other
- Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
- Portola Valley: Westridge
- Portola Valley: Woodside Highlands
- Woodside: Emerald Hills
- Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
- Woodside: Kings Mountain/Skyline
- Woodside: Mountain Home Road
- Woodside: other
- Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
- Woodside: Woodside Glens
- Woodside: Woodside Heights
- Woodside: Woodside Hills
- Belle Haven Elementary
- Corte Madera School
- Encinal School
- Hillview Middle School
- James Flood Magnet School
- La Entrada School
- Las Lomitas School
- Laurel School
- Menlo-Atherton High School
- Oak Knoll School
- Ormondale School
- Willow Oaks Elementary
- Woodside High School
- Woodside School
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Teavana Palo Alto closes
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,645 views
What Freshmen Should be Thinking About College
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 12 comments | 2,278 views
Sometimes the Rules Go Out the Window
By Cheryl Bac | 5 comments | 1,789 views
Waiting on the Edge of Death
By Chandrama Anderson | 5 comments | 843 views
Menlo Park Playing Nicely
By Paul Bendix | 0 comments | 191 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Menlo Park
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 The Almanac
All rights reserved.