another controversy at the DA's office
Original post made by studabaker on Mar 11, 2013
The complainnt is admonished not to share the contents of the letter to anyone, pursuant to an arcane provision of the California B&P Code?
Presumably the privacy rights and ability of a practitioner of the law to continue to earn a living are at stake.
Reputations are important when it comes to professional services.
Then again the conduct of the professional in question is a public official
This will be a huge headache for Wagstaffe.
It could cost him his job
If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Separate Entrances for BMR and Market Rate Apartments?
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 445 views