Commission looks at Nativity School parking
Original post made on Nov 13, 2013
Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, November 13, 2013, 9:44 AM
on Nov 13, 2013 at 12:51 pm
"Nativity parents say it will make dropping off and picking up their children more hazardous."
I don't understand this. There's a 250-foot-long drop-off zone just off Laurel that can be used for dropping off kids in addition to the main drop-off point along Oak Grove that's also about 250-feet long. Dropping off should be just that, not getting out of the car and walking the kids to the classroom. If you need to do that, park in one of the parking lots.
Even if it's determined that on-street parking is needed for the school, it should be limited to just those hours when school starts & ends, which would greatly reduce the conflict with bikes. At other times of the day there should be no need for parking here as the school has parking lots inside the property on both the Laurel and Oak Grove sides.
I bike this stretch of Laurel daily and can attest to the hazard I feel whenever I have to go around a parked car along this stretch, fearing someone will suddenly open their car door on my right, and worried on my left about the cars coming from behind as I'm forced out of the bike lane and into traffic. This is definitely the most dangerous part of my bike commute.
on Nov 14, 2013 at 9:30 am
The pull-in area on Laurel is for Staff parking only, it is not a drop-off area. Plus that section of Laurel is already NO PARKING during the morning drop off. This is all about extending the NO PARKING beyond the morning period to the entire 24-hr period.
And yes, many parents were asking for just including a parking allowance for the pickup period. This is mainly to allow KG parents the ability to park and then walk to the immediately adjacent KG to pick up their kids---and there is a policy of NOT allowing KG students to go to the drive-through pickup area ---they must be picked up at the KG class by a parent.
By eliminating parking, these KG students now need to likely cross over to the far side of Laurel -- not as dangerous as trying to cross a highway, but anyone with KG-age kids knows that they sometimes do things you'd rather not have them do -- like walk across an intersection before it's clear.
My main issue with the city's approach to this issue is that they are doing everything piecemeal. It's a very clear divide & conquer strategy that pits the whole MP community interested in bike lanes against a single block's residents. Why not deal with the WHOLE bike corridor at once? That way you'd at least get some consistency to the bike corridor and it would be a fairer, more inclusive process. And for the record, I'm actually FOR bike lanes. I just don't like the way their pushing it through.
Another issue I've had with the city's approach is they haven't even bothered with a trial of the PARKING restrictions. What the heck is wrong with the following approach?
1. Decide on bike corridor-long parking restriction changes to put in place.
2. Put up temporary parking restriction signs as have been decided on.
3. See if there is enough parking to accommodate the needs of the community along that bike corridor.
4. Adjust parking restrictions if needed.
Instead all we got was a staff report that estimates there won't be a problem accommodating the parking. This seems like a very lazy approach to transportation planning to me.
I wish the transportation commission would consider asking City Staff to change their process to make it more inclusive of the whole city, AND make City Staff actually do a thorough test of their proposed changes.
on Nov 14, 2013 at 11:36 am
A clarification: I believe the Nativity parent community is advocating creating BOTH a dedicated east-side bike lane AND parking. The concern is that in eliminating parking on the east side of Laurel, we will be pushing parking and more traffic onto the Oak Grove (making a left into the carpool line wich will undoubtedly create back up traffic heading towards M-A) and onto Pine Street. Oak Grove is already very congested and dangerous to cross. Pine Street is tiny and can ill-afford more cars. Parents asked the City to look into grant funding in order to create carve outs on the east side of Laurel Street like there on Oak Grove.