CFPPC dismisses ridiculuous Peter Carpenter complaint.
Original post made by old timer on Jun 3, 2014
Mr. Carpenter has been constantly trolling against the SaveMenlo initiative and advocating for letting Stanford and other developers build higher and denser projects, which is certainly what the visioning process for the Specific Plan did not intend.
Maybe this ruling, issued in a very short period of about 2 weeks will do something to silence him a bit.
(article in the just out print edition of the Almanac June 4 2014 page 7)
on Jun 3, 2014 at 9:41 pm
I note that the Almanac staff appear to have arbitrarily disabled anonymous comments midstream on the related "State commission declines to investigate Save Menlo classification" thread, likely at Peter Carpenter's urging. If that practice continues this forum will grow very quiet, save for the inexorable thrumming of Peter's own efforts, of course. Sad,
on Jun 3, 2014 at 9:45 pm
Peter Carpenter is a registered user.
"likely at Peter Carpenter's urging."
No, the editors do not consult with me on their decisions.
"his forum will grow very quiet" primarily because the Lanza/Fry initiative supporters REFUSE to answer any questions.
on Jun 5, 2014 at 5:56 pm
In a related thread, Peter Carpenter wrote:
"Sadly I think I understand the Lanza/Fry initiative even better than do its authors."
My my what an EGO and what arrogance from Peter Carpenter.