Everest, Sequoia district dance to familiar tune
Original post made on Mar 9, 2010
Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, March 9, 2010, 11:35 AM
on Mar 9, 2010 at 2:02 pm
Here we go again. Dr. Gemma is making his farewell tour and is still playing limbo: "How low can I go?"
It would appear that SUHSD is doing what they can to make an absolute minimum offer and then rush to hide behind a technical defense. Why would the Everest folks move from a place where there is stability for a few years to be a roaming band of noamds moving at SUHSDs will? If SUHSD were negotiating in good faith, why is it impossible to provide facilities for more than one year. The district continues to treat Everest as slightly less than an afterthought and seems surprised that relations have not improved.
I suppose the only surprising thing here is that the classrooms are all on the same campus. I was half expecting four classrooms at Woodside and four in EPA or something like that.
on Mar 9, 2010 at 2:16 pm
Appropriate title to this article. It is a the same old offer that doesn't solve any problem other than posture the District. I'm glad Everest is staying put. I feel sorry for the Woodside Principal, I understand he was blind-sided by the District as well when this proposal was released.
on Mar 10, 2010 at 12:33 am
Here we go again! The District makes a decent offer to Everest - Woodside High School no less and notin so called remote East Palo Alto that was rejected last time because it was too remote and not in Redwood City. It is never going to be good enough for Tavenner. She wants it all. If they students want to be treated like regular students at Woodside High School then I suggest that they enroll there.