Firefighters duck gunfire in East Palo Alto
Original post made on Dec 17, 2012
Read the full story here Web Link posted Saturday, December 15, 2012, 9:15 AM
on Dec 17, 2012 at 1:20 pm
I would like to start a discussion to hear what others think about holding the parents of gang members (17 and younger) responsible for any and all crimes their gang-involved kid(s) commit or participate in, and if the gang member receives ANY support from the parent(s), then the age of the gang member doesn't matter. By support I mean money, housing (including use of the parent's mailing address to list as their resudence), food, clothing, childcare and anything else that contributes or enables their kid(s) to participate in gang activity in any form. Here's why: Parents have a responsibility to everyone to raise a law abiding, responsible, and productive member of society, and they should know what their child is involved in. It doesn't matter if the parent(s) are educated or not, work 5 jobs or not, are raising their kid(s) alone or not. If a person decides to have a child you should be forced to accept the consequences that come with that responsibility. Gangs recruit kids and teenagers, and no one can convince me that the parents are completely oblivious to their child's involvement, and if they are oblivious or don't care about it, then they are just as guilty as their child committing the crime because they should know.
Why do we hold bar owners responsible when their bartender continues to serve an intoxicated person who later leaves that bar and causes a collision, but not the parent(s) of a gang member who continuously enables their child's participation in the gang by turning a blind eye to it and allowing it to continue? Forbid it, move your family away from it, do whatever it takes or kick your child out and cease communication with them, because doing nothing about it IS a CHOICE. it's a choice to be an enabler, to be part of the problem instead of part of the solution.
on Dec 17, 2012 at 3:08 pm
Parents are civily responsible for the damages their minor children cause. The problem is the parents are pretty much lawsuit proof because typically they don't have a pot to pee in. It's like trying to get blood from a stone.
on Dec 17, 2012 at 5:59 pm
SteveC is a registered user.
Menlo Voter forgot the window to throw the pee out. AND often times the parents are gang members also or embrase the gang mentality or do not give a damn abou the kids and it is the gang that gives them the sense of a family and loyality.