Guns, a Year after Sandy Hook | On a Roll | Paul Bendix | Almanac Online |

Local Blogs

On a Roll

By Paul Bendix

About this blog: A 32-year resident of Menlo Park, I regularly make my way around downtown in a wheelchair. This gives me an unusual perspective on a town in which I have spent almost half of my life. I was educated at UC Berkeley, and permanentl...  (More)

View all posts from Paul Bendix

Guns, a Year after Sandy Hook

Uploaded: Jan 21, 2014 of the nation's most deeply entrenched, emotional and perennial issues. And kudos to Stanford Continuing Studies for presenting last week's public debate, 'Guns in America: a Year after Sandy Hook.' Hundreds of people turned up. And what was accomplished?

A civil discussion. Which on this volatile topic amounts to a major achievement.

The two attorneys, variously arguing for and against a tightening of national gun regulations, made predictable points. And they responded well to unpredictable questions. The latter came from a moderator who knew the territory well enough to avoid clichés and not throw softball questions either way.

As a shooting victim, I tend to turn up at such events. My basic attitude towards guns and their regulation partly derives from years in the UK.

In the early 1970s, about a year after my own shooting, I wandered into a West End pub. A man at the bar observed that I was 'a bit banged up, but you can still handle your pint.' He asked what had happened, and I told him about my mugging. Looking incredulous, he slowly turned and asked 'where did the bloke get the gun?'

To me at age 22, his question sounded ridiculous. But this man was old, probably more than 45, so this was to be expected. What did it matter where the gun came from?

A few more years in Britain changed my mind. Guns and their origins matter greatly.

As for the recent Stanford gun debate, I came away with two impressions. First, I am glad that organizations like the National Institutes of Health are, once again, able to study the epidemiology of gun violence. It's been more than 20 years since researchers like Arthur Kellermann examined firearms ownership and the relationship to violence in the home. The gun lobby has long opposed such research.

And there was a telling moment. The attorney advocating for laissez-faire gun laws lightly observed that automatic weapons were 'fun to fire.'

And doubtless they are. Although not so much fun if you're a combat vet. Or in law enforcement. The fun is reserved for amateurs, people who dabble in gun use. The problem is that firearm violence is a deeply serious and adult matter. The sense of power, the boyish fantasies...all this seems natural. Our national statistics on gun homicide, suicide and accidents...there's nothing natural about that.
What is it worth to you?


Posted by Chem, a resident of another community,
on Jan 22, 2014 at 3:20 pm

I am a combat veteran, have been a reserve LEO and think that firing semi-automatic weapons can be a tremendous amount of fun. It would also be important to point out that the higher echelons of skill in the use of arms tend to be dominated by non-military or LE shooters or by LEOs or mil shooters who are also enthusiasts on the side (not in a professional capacity).

Posted by Rich, a resident of another community,
on Jan 22, 2014 at 5:54 pm

Mental health is the avenue to gun confiscation..
Politicians and media push gun control in a dishonest manner..

Web Link

Posted by SoWhy, a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown,
on Jan 22, 2014 at 10:08 pm

Sure, study gun violence, but if you do- do it honestly and fairly, which means taking race into account and documenting all gun violence, rather than cherry picking. The results will speak for themselves.

And while I do empathize very much with your life changing incident, if you look at fully automatic gun toting criminals in London today, one group reigns supreme, the Yardies.

No one talks about them, as it is not politically correct.

Posted by MBL, a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven,
on Jan 23, 2014 at 8:58 pm

There is something intrinsically immature and damaged in someone who finds fun in discharging a killing machine for the sake of it.
Unfortunately, because we live in a society where most people are spiritually hungry (without out even knowing it, because you can't miss what you never experienced), the allure of one more "toy" is not something that their underdeveloped intellect can resist.

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

California must do a better job spending cap-and-trade revenue
By Sherry Listgarten | 1 comment | 1,830 views

Planting a Fall Garden?
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,458 views