By Steve Levy
E-mail Steve Levy
About this blog: I grew up in Los Angeles and moved to the area in 1963 when I started graduate school at Stanford. Nancy and I were married in 1977 and we lived for nearly 30 years in the Duveneck school area. Our children went to Paly. We moved ... (More)
About this blog: I grew up in Los Angeles and moved to the area in 1963 when I started graduate school at Stanford. Nancy and I were married in 1977 and we lived for nearly 30 years in the Duveneck school area. Our children went to Paly. We moved downtown in 2006 and enjoy being able to walk to activities. I do not drive and being downtown where I work and close to the CalTrain station and downtown amenities makes my life more independent. I have worked all my life as an economist focusing on the California economy. My work centers around two main activities. The first is helping regional planning agencies such as ABAG understand their long-term growth outlook. I do this for several regional planning agencies in northern, southern and central coast California. My other main activity is studying workforce trends and policy implications both as a professional and as a volunteer member of the NOVA (Silicon Valley) and state workforce boards. The title of the blog is Invest and Innovate and that is what I believe is the imperative for our local area, region, state and nation. That includes investing in people, in infrastructure and in making our communities great places to live and work. I served on the recent Palo Alto Infrastructure Commission. I also believe that our local and state economy benefits from being a welcoming community, which mostly we are a leader in, for people of all religions, sexual preferences and places of birth. (Hide)
View all posts from Steve Levy
Property rights and the will of the people
Uploaded: Sep 2, 2014
"Why would property rights trump the will of the people?"
Mark Weiss posted this question on my blog before he announced his candidacy for city council.
My answer is yes property rights go first with two important clarifications. One, property rights do not include the right to an automatic increase in zoning or waiver or exception unless reviewed and approved by the city council. Two, property rights do not include the right to promise public benefits and not follow through.
"Why" is the question Mark Weiss posed.
To me rights are really, really important. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that rights are only in force if the group in question is currently popular.
The rights of African Americans to vote and participate in our country without segregation would have been and would still be an even longer struggle without the concept of rights. The rights of gay Americans to marry and avoid discrimination would have been and still would be an even longer struggle if the "will of the people" prevailed in every local community. The same goes for women's reproductive rights. When my mom and dad bought their home 65 years ago, the covenant against selling to Jews was just ending. Now where they live is a vibrant community with Jews, Koreans and gay residents all living together with others in harmony. That's why rights are important.
I know some residents are angry with some property owners in Palo Alto. But that does not mean their rights are subject to the will or whim of the current residents.
Palo Alto and America would be worse places if basic rights were up for a vote every time some group became unpopular.
That's my answer to Mark's question.
What is it worth to you?
Post a comment
Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.