Traffic -- the 3 R's of Cars | On a Roll | Paul Bendix | Almanac Online |

Local Blogs

On a Roll

By Paul Bendix

E-mail Paul Bendix

About this blog: A 32-year resident of Menlo Park, I regularly make my way around downtown in a wheelchair. This gives me an unusual perspective on a town in which I have spent almost half of my life. I was educated at UC Berkeley, and permanentl...  (More)

View all posts from Paul Bendix

Traffic -- the 3 R's of Cars

Uploaded: Oct 9, 2014
This week the City of Menlo Park hosted an evening presentation on transportation issues – at which I learned a lot about human movement. And even more about human nature, principally my own. Civic engagement, it turns out, is work. It's a lot of work. And I'm often not up to the task.

On Wednesday night the task was to learn. What is at stake when we plan how to move people around an area? Well, according to a consulting traffic engineer, the issues range from happiness to social equity, not to mention economics and regional responsibility.

Santa Cruz Avenue, for example, may score an F in traffic through flow, while scoring an A in economic viability. These two ratings often go together, as does the inverse...light traffic equals light patronage. Obvious, right? This only gets complicated when asking what people like. Less business and lighter traffic or more business and heavier traffic? What about fairness? If less affluent people frequently have longer commutes, do they need better transportation? What if the latter requires sacrifices from more affluent commuters? Similarly, what if speeding traffic through Menlo Park shifts congestion elsewhere?

Wednesday, I learned what every good urban planning wonk already knows: the metric for traffic flow is 'level of service' (LOS). Thing is, the yardstick is contradictory and outdated. For example, LOS only counts vehicles. It doesn't measure human impact. A 1000-vehicle traffic jam might delay 1000 single-occupancy drivers – or if it includes 12 buses, upwards of 1500 people. That's why LOS is a poor metric for environmental impact. California is redefining LOS, and the public comment period is still open.

I left Wednesday's meeting after an hour. The presentation was splendid, but it came at the end of a long day. Still, next time I hope to hang in there a little longer. Democracy is a do-it-yourself affair. We are all amateurs – but we can be informed amateurs. In fact, we must be. Next time.
We need your support now more than ever. Can we count on you?


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood,
on Oct 13, 2014 at 7:05 am

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Paul - Thank you for your continuing efforts to be an informed citizen. It IS hard work but without informed citizens elections are problematic at best.

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Get fact-based reporting on the COVID-19 crisis sent to your inbox daily.

A tea house, a speakeasy, a beloved restaurant: The Van's in Belmont has closed for good
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 10,167 views

Why I am suspicious about PA’s budget cuts
By Diana Diamond | 26 comments | 2,766 views

We are testing geoengineering, and that is a good thing
By Sherry Listgarten | 23 comments | 2,336 views

Premarital and Couples: Taking Breaks (Fallow Time)
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,157 views

A Book Connecting the Generations
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 1,629 views