Two, Three, One

Very interested in all three. There are many relationships that impact Palo Alto and environs. Recognizing that potential school enrollments related to estimated students "generated" in all types of housing units is not included in standard EIR review of housing projects. It cannot be used as the basis for denial of projects. However, certainly it needs to be discussed and clearly PAUSD needs to figure out ways to accommodate all the students that arrive at their door steps. In public debates this issue is raised and the points made above are correct. There are also programmatic adjusts that schools can make if a crunch occurs: re-examining varied schedules to maximize use of classroom and school space, more on-line education options. Some districts have implemented or considered 3 or 3.5 year options for high school.

Definitely most interested in housing and school enrollment.

Housing and school enrollment and the new ADU regulations.

None of the above. They've been done many times in many posts.

Portion deleted

deleted

I asked for interest or not in the choices I listed without additional comments. If you want to respectfully explain your top priority among the three topics, go for it.

The housing cost problem solution WAS in the first sentence:

SL

Sorry if I confused you. The topic is how to reduce housing costs fior people who want to move here or stay here. I think it is disrespectful to tell other people to leave the area. If they want to be here. They can choose to do so as can you. Let them and the companies decide. But since people and companies do want to be here, I thought the ongoing work on how to reduce the cost of new housing might be interesting to readers.

prop 13. and how it keeps prices high and supply low. how it and nimbyism have exacerbated the housing crisis

One, two, three.

First priority - Two.

Second priority - One

Three is a black hole and there would be no accountable outcomes to this discussion.