Please Stop Wagging Menlo Park! | Creating A More Vibrant Menlo Park | Dana Hendrickson | Almanac Online |

Local Blogs

Creating A More Vibrant Menlo Park

By Dana Hendrickson

E-mail Dana Hendrickson

About this blog: My wife and I moved to central Menlo Park in 1985 where we have raised two sons. A retired high-tech executive, I now actively participate in local and national community service programs. I am the founder and director of Rebuil...  (More)

View all posts from Dana Hendrickson

Please Stop Wagging Menlo Park!

Uploaded: Feb 4, 2019
(Who gets to decide the future of our downtown)

“Opponents of the viaduct alternative almost succeeded in getting this option eliminated by the city last year because of widespread but unsubstantiated fears that a viaduct would be ugly and trains running on elevated tracks would create unacceptable noise.” (Editorial, Palo Alto Weekly, February 1, 2019)

Sound familiar? For the past two years, one well-organized neighborhood group has repeatedly mischaracterized and demonized the ”viaduct” grade separation alternative at Menlo Park city council and rail subcommittee meetings. At first, the city council yielded to its pressure and would not study this option. Then last May, proponents of a study persuaded the council to at least consider a study proposal. Eight months later, there is still no proposal, and of course, no approved study.

First, some facts: the fully elevated grade separation (FEGS) alternative would NOT erect an “end-to-end” train viaduct that extends along Felton Gables and Linfield Oaks neighborhoods. Instead, a short fully elevated rail structure (viaduct) would be built only in the downtown commercial district. Like with Alternatives B and C, graduated tracks to the north and south of grade separations would be elevated on berms. But unlike these alternatives, a tall berm would NOT physically and visually divide Menlo Park between Glenwood and Ravenswood. Instead, the viaduct would have a series of tall and wide openings for pedestrian and bicyclist use.

I am one of many residents who support a study of fully elevated grade separations at Ravenswood and Oak Grove, and Glenwood PLUS a fully elevated viaduct that connects them.

We share several beliefs.

• The “up-and-coming” retail/housing/office district in the train station area is a valuable city resource that would be further enhanced by a beautiful civic plaza, a key proposal in the Menlo Park Specific Plan. Therefore, the selected grade separation solution should enhance rather than limit its potential.

• ALL Menlo Park residents deserve the opportunity to understand this alternative and express their well-informed concerns and preferences.

• Our city leaders are responsible for ensuring residents have this opportunity. They must never allow a small vocal minority of residents to undermine this principle. In this case, a neighborhood representing less than 1% of Menlo Park residents has exerted way too much influence on city council decisions affecting our downtown.

• Residents should trust that both our city council and the majority of residents would never support any grade separation alternative that would significantly harm any neighborhood.

No grade separation solution will satisfy everyone, but the city council must select the one preferred by a majority of well-informed residents rather than by an unrepresentative minority. The council members must also set aside their own personal biases. It’s time to conduct a well-designed study of the FEGS alternative. The sooner facts are known, the better for everyone.

(This is the fourth post in a continuing series about planning for future Menlo Park grade separations.)
We can't do it without you.
Support local journalism.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Lauren John, a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks,
on Feb 4, 2019 at 7:16 pm

I attended the last City Council meeting on grade separations to express concern about eliminating the turn/traffic on Alma Street.
During the meeting we heard a lot of talk and saw a few two dimensional photos illustrating alternatives.
What makes this so difficult to understand is that it is really hard to visualize all of this and the two dimensional maps don't help all that much.
With all the technology know how here in Silicon Valley, can't someone create a 3D model or video or other form of simulation so that we can all better picture the viaducts, berms (still not sure how berm is defined) and other structures?
I have some images in my mind and comparisons were made to structures in the industrial parts of Redwood City and San Carlos, but I still do not have a clear idea of what the grade separations will look like.
Help please!

 +  Like this comment
Posted by Dana Hendrickson, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park,
on Feb 5, 2019 at 12:41 pm

Hi Lauren:

I recommend that you view the presentation and videos shown at the June 7, 2017 Community Meeting.

Here is the link Web Link

 +  Like this comment
Posted by Dana Hendrickson, a Almanac Online blogger,
on Feb 28, 2019 at 12:56 pm

Dana Hendrickson is a registered user.

 +  Like this comment
Posted by Dana Hendrickson, a Almanac Online blogger,
on Feb 28, 2019 at 12:56 pm

Dana Hendrickson is a registered user.

 +  Like this comment
Posted by Dana Hendrickson, a Almanac Online blogger,
on Feb 28, 2019 at 12:57 pm

Dana Hendrickson is a registered user.

 +  Like this comment
Posted by jim, a resident of Atherton: Lloyden Park,
on Mar 3, 2019 at 6:59 am

I attended the last City Council meeting on grade separations to express concern about eliminating the turn/traffic on Alma Street. Web Link

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Don't be the last to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

First Sunnyvale, then Australia: Mountain View's Le Plonc plots expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 2,482 views

Juggling Renewables
By Sherry Listgarten | 39 comments | 2,016 views

Premarital and Couples: Living as Roommates?
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,441 views

Homestead Faire at Hidden Villa 4/27
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 828 views

A trial run
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 545 views


The Almanac Readers' Choice ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "The Almanac Readers' Choice" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 27th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 17th issue of The Almanac.