Street Parking Should NOT Be Removed For Bicyclists On Middle Avenue (Part 2) | Creating A More Vibrant Menlo Park | Dana Hendrickson | Almanac Online |

Local Blogs

Creating A More Vibrant Menlo Park

By Dana Hendrickson

E-mail Dana Hendrickson

About this blog: My wife and I moved to central Menlo Park in 1985 where we have raised two sons. A retired high-tech executive, I now actively participate in local and national community service programs. I am the founder and director of Rebuil...  (More)

View all posts from Dana Hendrickson

Street Parking Should NOT Be Removed For Bicyclists On Middle Avenue (Part 2)

Uploaded: May 13, 2019
(Updated June 10, 2019)

In April the Menlo Park Complete Street Commission proposed that all street parking on Middle Avenue be banned between Olive and San Mateo and existing parking areas replaced with bike lanes. The Commission alleges this action is needed to increase the safety of students biking to Hillview and Oak Knoll, primarily because they might otherwise swerve into the path of fast-moving traffic to avoid opening doors. After talking to other bicyclists, parents and affected homeowners I have concluded that bike lanes are not needed and street parking should only be banned for a couple of hours on weekdays. This measure should be sufficient to address bike safety concerns.

General Observations

1. Bicyclist Safety Responsibilities. Like motorists bicyclists including students who are qualified to ride bikes to school without supervision must recognize the general risks associated with using our streets and accept responsibility for avoiding actions that endanger them. This includes how they pass parked vehicles. They should slow down, remain vigilant, and be prepared to stop quickly if a door opens into their path. No bicyclists should ever swerve into a vehicle lane unless they are absolutely sure it is safe to do so. An unavoidable slow collision with a vehicle door is always preferable to getting run-over.

2. Non-Bicyclist Safety Responsibilities. Our city cannot completely eliminate the risks of biking. Bike safety education programs in our schools need to identify the risks of riding on popular streets AND emphasize appropriate safe riding behavior. Parents need to reinforce bike safety education and act as fine examples. (Note: I often witness Oak Knoll parents with children ride through the stop signs at Oak and Lemon after school.) And motorists need to always check for bicyclists before opening doors and exiting street parking spaces.

3. Street Sharing. Menlo Park streets were originally designed and built to support vehicles and pedestrians long before the city had a policy of supporting bicyclists. Unfortunately, this means new bike lanes typically require other street users to sacrifice existing services and benefits. While these may be reasonable, bike projects proposals must always include fair evaluations of all trade-offs. This requires an honest assessment of both safety concerns and negative impacts AND meaningful input from non-bicyclists who would be directly affected, e.g., businesses and homeowners.

4. Our city RARELY studies the actual need for new bike infrastructure elements, e.g. bike lanes, signage, street markings. It neither conducts trustworthy field audits (observations) nor performs well-accepted safety analyses. Instead, it relies largely on opinions and anecdotal evidence.

Middle Avenue Observations

Illustration: West End Of Middle Avenue

1. Bike Lane Safety. Installing bike lanes can sometimes significantly increase bike safety. It depends on things like street characteristics, vehicle traffic patterns, motorist behavior, and parking patterns, I do not believe the riding conditions on this section of Middle warrants the installation of bike lanes based on safety concerns. The existing parking/pedestrian area on Middle is 11-feet wide, and most vehicles take between 6 and 7 feet of this space. This leaves plenty of space for bicyclists to safely pass a parked vehicle when doors are closed.

On two school day mornings in early June I observed vehicle traffic, parking and bicyclist patterns on the west end of Middle and learned the following:

=> Only three vehicles were parked on Middle between San Mateo and Olive; another three were parked between Arbor and San Mateo. None of the vehicles had a driver inside and their were no "opening doors".

=> Fourteen Oak Knoll students were observed; eleven were very young and accompanied by adults. This is sound behavior as very young bicyclists need to be actively coached and are less visible to motorists. Twenty-four bicyclists were Hillview students, and they rode carefully and confidently. No student abruptly swerved around parked cars.

=> Adult bicyclists generally ride either on or just inside the white line when passing parked vehicles. This is a safe maneuver as they did so smoothly and were highly visible to motorists.

=> Most adult bike commuters who crossed Middle at San Mateo stopped and waited for motorists to let them pass, and motorists were generally very supportive. However, bicyclists riding westbound on Middle and turning left on San Mateo often took the vehicle lane without first checking vehicle traffic. This is a very unsafe maneuver and surprised several drivers.

2. Infrequent Exposure To Opening Doors. The Commission acknowledges that usually no more than five vehicles are parked on both sides so the exposure to opening doors is extremely small. I have driven on Middle thousands of times and never witnessed a bicyclist colliding with an opening vehicle door.

3. Bicyclist Comfort. Bike lanes make some bicyclist feel more comfortable (less stressed), and some parents feel more comfortable knowing their children are riding in them. I have not seen any data or analysis that indicates riding comfort is an usually high level of concern on this section of Middle.

4. Street Parking Loss. While the benefits of adding bike lanes remain questionable, the loss of street parking would be certain and significant for thirty Middle Avenue homeowners, visitors, guests, and service providers if street parking were banned all day every day. (Note: ten more homes would be affected if the bike lanes were extended to Arbor). Keep in mind that many households have three drivers and vehicles, short driveways and do not park in garages, There would also be negative impacts on side streets, e.g., more street parking.

5. Vehicle Speed Limits. Middle Avenue homeowners have repeatedly expressed concern about bicyclist and pedestrian safety at the intersections where they cross Middle. They believe many vehicles ignore the existing 30 mph speed limit and travel between 30 to 40 mph and have frequently proposed lowering the speed limit to 25 mph.

Photo: Hillview Students Riding On Santa Cruz Avenue After School

Primary Conclusions

1. “More bike safety at all costs” is bad city policy. The needs of all street users must be considered and the trade-offs must be carefully and pragmatically weighed. Taking away existing benefits is not a small matter.

2. Bike lanes on this section of Middle will NOT materially improve bike safety. They would increase the comfort (reduce the stress) of some bicyclists and parents of young children. And bike lanes would also act as an effective reminder to motorists that Middle is popular with bicyclists.

3. Banning all parking would significantly harm homeowners and other motorists. While street parking in residential neighborhoods is neither a right nor a privilege, it is a widely accepted norm and should NOT be violated unless there are big safety problems. This has NOT been proven for bicyclists riding on this section of Middle. Banning parking on just one side creates NEW safety problems - especially after dark - for drivers who park and must then walk across Middle. Crosswalks at intersections are too inconvenient to be of value to them.

4. Regardless of whether bike lanes are installed or not, street parking should only be banned when MOST Hillview and Oak Grove students are biking to and from school, e.g., in the morning, between 7:30 and 8:15 a.m. This solution would balance the needs of homeowners, motorists and bicyclists.

5.. Lowering and enforcing a 25 mph speed limit on Middle might significantly improve pedestrian and bicyclist comfort and safety at crossings. The new "bike and pedestrian crossing" signs at San Mateo are very beneficial; adding flashing warnings would be better (more visible).

6. All proposals for new bike infrastructure should be based on real-world data, observations and sound analysis. Depending on idealism and abstract reasoning generally leads to "overkill" solutions. Also, field trials cannot be trusted without the study of real-world observations before and after them.

7. There are many streets in and near downtown Menlo Park popular with bicyclists that warrant much greater safety concerns than the west end of Middle.

= > More than two-dozen Hillview students regularly ride on downtown Santa Cruz after school. They can share the vehicle lanes but seldom do in traffic and instead ride closely along parked cars. These vehicles are more likely to open doors in their paths. Also, many motorists do not believe bicyclists even have the right to be on this street.

=> Similar situations exist on University between Santa Cruz and on Menlo and the same bike improvements are needed.

=> Ravenswood lacks continuous bike lanes between El Camino and Laurel.

My Recommendations

1. Ban on street parking ONLY during the times most students are riding bikes to and from
school. In the morning this means between 7:30 and 8:15 am.

2. I do not believe bike lanes are needed. If they are installed, street signs should indicate that parking is permitted except at specific times during the school year. Physical barriers should NOT separate the vehicle and bike lanes as these would harm motorists who wish to park along the curb.

3. Adding a white line along Middle about 6.5 feet from the curb would encourage motorists to park close to the curb.

4. Strictly enforce the speed limit on Middle and evaluate whether more stop signs and a 25 mph speed limit would significantly improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

5. The Complete Street Commission should make improving bike safety on University, downtown Santa Cruz, Menlo and Ravenswood a high priority. (Note: These are not addressed in the draft Transportation Master Plan.) While bike lanes are not possible until the city has more off-street parking downtown, meaningful short-term measures are possible now. For example, “Bikes Have The Right To Share Lanes” and clearly visible sharrow street markings would benefit both motorists and bicyclists.

Note: For a detailed analysis of the bike lane proposal see "Should Street Parking Be Removed On Middle For Bicyclists? (Part 1)".
What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


 +   8 people like this
Posted by MiddleResident, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park,
on May 13, 2019 at 4:50 pm

What plans does the city have the section of Middle between San Mateo and University? Bike Lanes? More parking bans? Too fast traffic is the real problem on Middle; the 30 mph speed limit is a joke. No one complies. Why not simply add a stop sign at San Mateo where bicyclists cross to reach the bridge at SF Creek and Hillview students can safely ride to the bike lanes on Santa Cruz. And ban street parking only on weekdays for an hour or so in the morning and afternoon? That should be sufficient!

 +   3 people like this
Posted by listen to commissioners, a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows,
on May 13, 2019 at 9:56 pm

Dana, your point of view is sad. We respect the conclusions of the complete streets commission; this is a group of people that take time away from their families to volunteer for the city and be educated on important issues. I hope the city council ignores your input and takes the advise of the commission.

 +   11 people like this
Posted by middle cyclists, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park,
on May 14, 2019 at 12:10 am

I am sorry 'listen to commissioners". Although I value the time these citizen take away from their families to sit on commissions, from what I glean most of them are recreational cyclists at best and not riding these streets day in day out and in rush hour.

The suggestions brought forward here (STOP signs and/or other speed control measures) are sensible and real world applicable (except that temporary parking ban, which won't work).

If those members spend any extended time riding their bikes or observing traffic patters (vehicle speed/cyclist hot spots and close calls) on University and Middle, I have a hard time understanding how they don't see the flaws in their current strategy (in creating speed alleys for cars).
Do they know that the force hitting something goes up at the Square of speed?

Just look at a regular Tuesday (trash day on University) or any time on the University and Middle race tracks during rush hour (it's almost a miracle that nobody got seriously hurt/killed.
Stanford students are young and springy and visitors of Rosener House (adult day care) get driven across Middle...go figure.

Go ahead, speed up car traffic on University and Middle....commissioners may save drivers 10 secs getting home.

 +   9 people like this
Posted by Listen to Dana, a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown,
on May 14, 2019 at 7:57 am

@Listen to Commissioners

Dana takes time away from his family, volunteers to write this column, and gets educated on the issues. His opinion is worth considering as well as anyone who has studied this bike lane issue.

The Menlo Park Complete Streets Commission is not a random sample of citizens assembled together to study and approve street changes. People who join the commission are generally bicycle and pedestrian advocates. They have a point of view. It's important to consider their point of view, but also realize they have biases too.

 +   8 people like this
Posted by Oak Knoll School Parent, a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park,
on May 15, 2019 at 11:25 am

Street parking is not permitted when kids are riding bikes to and from Oak Knoll School and this appears to work well. Bicyclists, pedestrian and passing motorist all benefit, and I doubt nearby residents are upset about NOT parking on the street on school days for a 30-minute period in the morning and 45-minute period in the afternoon. “No Parking, 7:45 am to 8:15 am and 2:30 pm to 3:15 pm" signs exist on parts of Oak, Oak Knoll and White Oak. This is a great compromise. Why doesn't the city take a similar approach on Middle?

 +   1 person likes this
Posted by Cmon, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park,
on May 15, 2019 at 7:41 pm

It makes the most sense to begin a phased approach to removing parking on middle and to connect to the bike bridge, ultimately. It's just safer without having riders driving into the road with distracted drivers. It is safer still with protected bike lanes. We need to see how much this can change the experience of living in the city, much like it does in more bike friendly communities.

 +   3 people like this
Posted by Dana Hendrickson, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park,
on May 19, 2019 at 12:19 pm

Cmon: Today bicyclists ride in existing 11-foot wide parking/biking strips that are adjacent to the vehicle lanes. These are MUCH wider than standard buffered and "protected" bike lanes (5 + 2 = 7 feet).

* Middle between Olive and San Mateo is already safe and bike-friendly, and there is no reason for a bicyclist to swerve into a vehicle lane. This is purely a hypothetical safety issue because competent bicyclists can avoid doing this.
* The section of Middle between San Mateo and University can be treated the same way as Olive to San Mateo.
* I support the proposed bike lanes between El Camino and University because this section of Middle is narrower AND there are is significant traffic and the traffic patterns at the Safeway Plaza and intersection are very complex.

Please remember: very few cars park on either side of Middle between Olive and San Mateo during weekdays Why penalize homeowners ALL the time to solve a non-existent safety problem???

(Note: protected bike lanes do not provide protection. Tin some situations they do make bicyclists and motorists feel more comfortable. These would be of little to no value on Middle between Olive and San Mateo.)

 +   2 people like this
Posted by Dana Hendrickson, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park,
on May 21, 2019 at 12:50 pm

Since the bike lane design for Oak Grove bike lane includes on street parking on one side I examined the assumptions about the space allocated for bicyclists s they can safely pass parked vehicles

(a) Width dedicated to parking: trucks + parking distance from curb = 7 feet + 1 foot = 8 feet parking lane
(b) Width of door zone buffer = 1.5 feet
(c) There is a 2 foot buffer between the bike and vehicle lanes.
(d) Width allocated to bicyclists passing parked vehicles = 3.5 feet

Compare this to the existing parking/biking strip on Middle.
(a) Existing width = 11 feet
(b) Parking allocation = 8 feet
, (c) Width allocated to bicyclists passing parked vehicles = 3 feet
(d) Make parking lane only 7.5 feet wide to force parking within 6 inches of curb.
(e) The width allocated to bicyclists passing parked vehicles becomes 3.5 feet

This is identical to Oak Grove.

Keep in mind that the probability of a door opening as a bicyclists passes a parked vehicle this section of Middle is EXTREMELY low. Plus, bicyclists should always proceed cautiously when passing one to avoid both a collision AND swerving into a vehicle lane.

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

After experiencing harassment, owner of Zareen's restaurants speaks out about Islamophobia, racism
By Elena Kadvany | 28 comments | 6,160 views

Don't Miss Your Exit (and other lessons from an EV drive)
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 2,096 views

Goodbye Food Waste!
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,955 views

"Better" Dads and "Re-invigorated" Moms: Happier Couples
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,435 views

Good News: The New Menlo Park Rail Subcommittee Hits A Home Run
By Dana Hendrickson | 11 comments | 1,339 views


Register today!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More