To help struggling restaurants, Santa Clara imposes cap on third party delivery fees | Peninsula Foodist | Elena Kadvany | Almanac Online |

Local Blogs

Peninsula Foodist

By Elena Kadvany

E-mail Elena Kadvany

About this blog: Get the latest food news with the biweekly Peninsula Foodist newsletter.
I am a perpetually hungry twenty-something journalist, born and raised in Menlo Park and currently workin...  (More)

View all posts from Elena Kadvany

To help struggling restaurants, Santa Clara imposes cap on third party delivery fees

Uploaded: Sep 3, 2020
Santa Clara has joined several Bay Area cities in adopting a temporary cap on the fees third party delivery apps can charge restaurants, which owners say can be prohibitively high and eat away at revenue that's already been drastically reduced during the pandemic.

The Santa Clara City Council unanimously approved on Tuesday an emergency ordinance implementing a 15% per-order cap for food delivery companies like DoorDash and Grubhub. The temporary measure aims to "accomplish the legitimate public purpose of easing the financial burden on struggling restaurants during this emergency while not unduly burdening third-party platforms," the ordinance reads.

Signs in the window of Osteria Toscana in Palo Alto promote the restaurant's takeout and delivery options. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

"Several restaurant owners told me they are facing fees as high as 30% from these third-party food delivery apps," Mayor Lisa M. Gillmor said in a press release. "Many of them have no choice but to pay these fees due to their current reliance on delivery orders. Now, the city is enacting this ordinance to help our struggling restaurants stay in business during the pandemic and beyond."

Ruth Shikada, assistant city manager, said that the city started looking into the possibility of a delivery cap after hearing concerns about the fees from local restaurant owners. They found several local examples of similar ordinances: San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Berkeley, Fremont, San Leandro and South San Francisco have all adopted delivery caps in recent months.

Navin Tekchandani, an owner at The Yellow Chili in Santa Clara, told the council that the modern Indian restaurant is now relying heavily on delivery orders after its usual source of revenue -- corporate meals and consultants traveling to Silicon Valley for work -- dropped off during the shutdown.

"We are highly dependent on corporate revenue to survive as a fine dining restaurant ... which has almost disappeared," he said. "Fine dining restaurants are not going to survive if the delivery fee is more than 15% simply because our margins are not that high."

Some local restaurants have started offering delivery themselves and many urge customers to place orders with them directly and pick them up to avoid the delivery fees.

The ordinance applies to all restaurants in Santa Clara, regardless of where they're delivering food, staff said. It took effect immediately, but if a delivery company charges a fee higher than 15% between Sept. 2 and 9, they won't be considered in violation of ordinance if they provide a refund to the restaurant before Sept. 19.

The Santa Clara ordinance also makes it illegal for delivery companies to keep any portion of a driver's tips, ensuring any gratuity goes directly to the driver. The ordinance requires third-party delivery companies to disclose the fees charged to app users, gratuities paid and any discounts offered by the restaurants.

The delivery cap will remain in effect in Santa Clara until the end of the city's COVID-19 state of emergency.

"30% is not acceptable when their revenue has gone down," Councilmember Raj Chahal said of restaurants. "This is in the right direction."
We need your support now more than ever. Can we count on you?


 +   4 people like this
Posted by JS, a resident of Rengstorff Park,
on Sep 3, 2020 at 2:25 pm

JS is a registered user.

"Some local restaurants have started offering delivery themselves and many urge customers to place orders with them directly and pick them up to avoid the delivery fees."

Wow! How ingenious and truly a market disrupting concept!!!

Seriously, why is the government getting involved with this? A restaurant or group of restaurants in near proximity can hire their own driver at a lower rate. Many restaurants do that currently and have done so in the past. Next up is the government limiting the amount of tip a customer can leave as it takes money away from the customer.

 +  Like this comment
Posted by Steven Goldstein, a resident of Old Mountain View,
on Sep 4, 2020 at 11:26 pm

Steven Goldstein is a registered user.

If the Uber/Lyft ballot measure fails, these delivery services will be likely closed.

I for one want the restaurants to hire their own delivery people.

Outsourcing to the Third parties simply makes earnings less for the whole of the delivery drivers in the end. Why would anyone give a tip to a Door Dash or GrubHub, when they aren't making the food?

The Third parties are simply making money on an illegal business plan.

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Get the most important local news stories sent straight to your inbox daily.

Tokyo ramen favorite Afuri headed to downtown Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 9,133 views

Which City Council candidates "get" climate change?
By Sherry Listgarten | 15 comments | 3,410 views

Premarital and Couples: I’m not getting what I need. How can I get him/her to change?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,973 views

ABAG's housing demands for local cities are too much
By Diana Diamond | 19 comments | 1,770 views