General Motors' auto mall plan in Menlo Park is stalled


General Motors' plans to build a Menlo Park auto mall have been put on hold.

A GM spokesperson said the automaker is still committed to building an auto mall on Bayfront Expressway at Willow Road, but due to slumping auto sales and an uncertain economy, the project isn't going anywhere quickly.

"We're still in discussions with the city, but the market's changed," said Susan Garontakos, dealer and field communications manager for GM. "We don't have any definitive plans for the site right now."

In October 2006, GM came forward with its proposal to build an auto mall at the property, which was then part of the Tyco Electronics campus. The project includes plans for 8.5 acres of the property to be allotted for GM dealerships, and the other 13.5 acres designated for non-GM dealerships or other retail uses.

GM officials said if all went well, the GM dealerships would be up and running by late 2008, but that doesn't look likely.

"It's a completely different environment in the industry and the economy right now compared (with) several years ago," Ms. Garontakos said. "We want to make sure [the auto mall is successful, and that means doing this right." She said GM currently has no timeline for the project.

Last year, GM officially purchased the property from Tyco for "in excess of $20 million," according to Menlo Park Business Development Manager David Johnson.

He said planning an auto mall is no easy feat, as GM has to draw independent dealers (both GM, and non-GM) to the site. But he said he's still confident the automaker will make its plans a reality.

"I fully expect them to see this project through," Mr. Johnson said. He noted that GM has "bigger issues" to take care of at the moment, including reports of a multi-billion dollar deficit for its 2007 fiscal year, and possible production cuts due to striking workers at auto part factories.

Tax sharing deal

The previous City Council voted unanimously in November 2006 to approve an agreement with GM that would evenly split -- between the city and GM -- the sales tax revenue generated from GM auto sales at the auto mall.

Under the deal, the city would share sales tax revenues for 15 years, or until GM receives $10 million. At the time, GM estimated first-year sales tax revenue from its dealerships at $1.5 million, meaning the city would get $750,000.

The auto mall project still requires environmental review and approval by the City Council.


Like this comment
Posted by truth
a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Mar 11, 2008 at 10:49 am

Surprise...NOT! This stunk from the beginning.

Like this comment
Posted by agree with truth
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Mar 14, 2008 at 10:16 am

our old council gave lots of concessions to a neanderthal-minded, financially troubled auto company and then we're surprised that this deal isn't progressing?

Like this comment
Posted by agree with agree with truth
a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on Mar 14, 2008 at 11:35 am

Kelly Fergusson touts this as one of her 'achievements'. She's been saying how she worked for a year to make it happen.

Like this comment
Posted by give me a break
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Mar 21, 2008 at 3:13 pm

Virtually every councilmember in the last council and the current council fell all over themselves to make this deal. It's ridiculous and plain mean to blame one person.
Lots of concessions were made, with minimal commitment to something coming in anytime soon. Never mind that the buyer wasn't in healthy financial position. Never mind that the site had been targeted for a transit station (I'm not advocating this, but it would be a better site than alternatives if Dumbarton Rail or even a new executive bus terminal ever come to be needed).

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 15 comments | 3,819 views

Eat, Surf, Love
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,247 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 866 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 272 views