Portola Valley postcard: Is there a message between the lines?

Timing, it's said, is everything. So what led town staff in Portola Valley to mail residents a postcard on July 27 informing them of the town's serious and unprecedented budget issues three months ahead of an election that would reauthorize the utility users tax? The tax brings in 10 percent of the town's revenue.

A municipal government is not allowed to take a position on an election issue, and the postcard's language does not take one; it doesn't even mention the utility tax. But a skeptical reader, seeing lists of reduced services, pared back plans, lower revenues and higher expenses, could also see a message to voters: renew the tax.

Voters reauthorized the tax by majorities of 72 percent in 2001 and 52 percent in 2005. The current $5.5 million budget is balanced and anticipates $556,000 in revenues from the 4.5 percent tax on residential and commercial utility bills.

A persistent utility tax opponent, resident Ed Wells, saw a message in the postcard. "I think it has to do with just mobilizing public information in connection with the upcoming utility users tax election," he told The Almanac.

The potential for inadvertent advocacy should have been considered by the full council, council members Maryann Moise Derwin and Richard Merk said in interviews.

"Someone should have asked these questions before it went out, and I don't think anyone did, and that concerns me," Mr. Merk said.

"I think we have to be very, very sensitive on this issue," Ms. Derwin said. The advocacy potential is there, she noted, adding: "I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think I am."

Mayor Ann Wengert said in an interview that staff had been fielding residents' budget-related questions recently and that the postcard conveys information about the town's financial condition. People can interpret the information as they choose, she said.

There was no ulterior motive, Town Manager Angie Howard said. "It seemed like a good idea to send something out to reassure the community that we're OK," she said. "I did not think this was controversial."


Like this comment
Posted by PV neighbor
a resident of Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
on Aug 13, 2009 at 9:44 pm

I think the town behaved appropriately by bringing the facts to everyone's attention. It's a real stretch to criticize our town's staff. Instead, let's thank them for opening our eyes to the situation.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 7 comments | 1,934 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 963 views


Readers' Choice ballot is here

It’s time to decide what local business is worthy of the title “Almanac Readers' Choice” — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 19th issue of The Almanac.