Enrollment surge: District unlikely to expand


A few years ago, there may have been a range of options acceptable to Las Lomitas School District officials to address the surge in enrollment the two-school district is experiencing.

But with the economy in deep recession, no local revenue growth and state cuts in education funding, a third campus or new buildings on existing campuses are recently examined options that appear unlikely to become reality.

In the next month or two, a committee of district staff, teachers, parents and other community members that has met for about nine months to study the enrollment issue is likely to recommend that the district deal with the enrollment surge with the addition of one or two portable buildings, if needed.

"In some respects, the conversation we began last year (about handling growing enrollment) crisscrossed with the conversation we're having to have now" about revenue shortfalls and the need to make about $1.5 million in budgetary cuts, Superintendent Eric Hartwig told The Almanac. The school community would be having "a more spirited discussion" about options such as expanding facilities if it were not for the dire financial situation, he said.

The district's enrollment has been growing at a rate of 4 percent a year for the last three years, Mr. Hartwig said, adding that the growth rate before that had been between 1 and 2 percent. Enrollment is expected to increase by 4 percent annually until 2015, at which time it could level off, then decline, he said. He cautioned, though, that accurate enrollment predictions are difficult to make.

Current total enrollment is about 1,200 students in the two schools: Las Lomitas (K-3) in Atherton, and La Entrada (4-8) in Menlo Park.

The committee studying the enrollment issue looked at options including building a new school on one of its two leased-out properties, one in Ladera and one near the district office in Menlo Park. The district now takes in $1.6 million in lease revenue from those sites.

But that option, and another that would involve building new permanent structures on the existing campuses, would probably require approval of a bond measure, something there appears to be little appetite for. Committee members and district leaders are aware that people are feeling pinched financially, and are reluctant to ask for more money at the ballot box, Mr. Hartwig said.

Also, he said, by the time new facilities were finished, "the enrollment bubble might be gone."

"It looks like the most logical direction to go would be to absorb our students as best we can because the growth doesn't seem to be permanent," he said.

The Feb. 10 school board decision to increase class sizes in the two schools to avoid having to hire new teachers makes the decision to absorb the students easier, Mr. Hartwig said. The board's decision was part of a package of moves that are expected to slash the budget by nearly $1.2 million.

The board will review the enrollment committee's report and recommendations as early as March 10, though the date is not firm, Mr. Hartwig said.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by LE parent
a resident of Portola Valley: Ladera
on Feb 24, 2010 at 12:59 pm

Thanks to the committee for understanding fiscal responsiblity, and I hope the teachers can understand this and come to some sort of an understanding.

Like this comment
Posted by Ellen
a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
on Mar 7, 2010 at 9:20 am

I am sure the teachers understand the situation, but their job is to teach and do the best job; and they have delivered. Have you noticed the real estate ads boasting "award winning schools"; of course there will be a surge of enrollment. In fact this will continue, as the rest of the schools in CA are heading south faster than LLSD since they are revenue limit.

The teacher's union will negotiate with the administrators representatives and both sides will position the optimize their own portion of the pie.

There's two sides of every story. Have you thought about those new parents that pay most of the taxes in the neighborhood because they just moved in recently? I don't want to make this a prop 13 post but the loop holes it allows for doesn't help fiscal responsiblity either. You can squeeze the teachers and program only so much. At some point the administrators will have to be brave enough to get those who aren't paying their share to step up too or the real tax payers will start buying elsewhere and the property values in the district will head south. Have fun juggling the budget cuts.

Like this comment
Posted by Susan
a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
on Mar 7, 2010 at 2:07 pm

I think that the highest paid teachers in our area should be thankful they are not losing their jobs like some district families and be happy to negotiate instead of press for unreasonable demands. If you bought a house recently, you knew what your taxes were going to be....taxes never go down!

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Couple brings Chinese zongzi to Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 6,154 views

Don't Miss Your Exit (and other lessons from an EV drive)
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 1,929 views

Goodbye Food Waste!
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,715 views

"Better" Dads and "Re-invigorated" Moms: Happier Couples
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,269 views

Bobby in Naziland: A Tale of Flatbush
By Stuart Soffer | 2 comments | 568 views


Register today!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More