News


Stanford medical facilities expansion could bring 10,000 more vehicle trips per day to the area

 

Local residents and government officials are getting a detailed look at the potential impacts of a massive rebuilding of Stanford University's medical facilities in Palo Alto, near the Menlo Park border, following the release of an environmental report on May 19.

The $3.5 billion project, which Palo Alto city officials routinely call the "largest project in the city's history," would bring about 1.3 million square feet of new development and more than 2,200 new employees to Palo Alto by 2025.

The project includes reconstruction of Stanford Hospital and Clinics, an expansion of Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, renovation of Hoover Pavilion, and replacement of School of Medicine facilities.

Perhaps of most interest to local residents, the report details how the project would affect local roadways and intersections, bringing 10,000 new vehicle trips to the area per day.

Glen Rojas, Menlo Park's city manager, said in an interview that the city has met with both Palo Alto and Stanford officials over plans to blunt traffic and other impacts on Menlo Park. The city is not prepared to comment on the specifics of the report, he said, adding that in the next two months it would draft a letter outlining the city's concerns.

While many of the cars going to and from the site would likely come through Menlo Park, the city does not have a vote on the project. Palo Alto's City Council reviewed the environmental report in a meeting Monday, May 24, and will eventually decide whether or not to approve the project.

Without mitigations, the report estimates that daily traffic would increase by 1 percent on Marsh Road west of U.S. 101, by 6 percent on Sand Hill Road east of Santa Cruz Avenue, by 5 percent on Willow Road east of Middlefield Avenue, by 2 percent on Alpine Road west of Junipero Serra, and by 1 percent on Ravenswood Avenue, east of El Camino Real.

By encouraging workers to take public transportation and building bike and pedestrian tunnels, Stanford could reduce the increased traffic to 2 percent or less on each of those roadways, according to the report. The university will be required to pay a "fair share" toward a long-planned bike and pedestrian underpass at Middle Road in Menlo Park.

The report describes in depth the impact of the project on local intersections, recommending various mitigation strategies, such as adjusting signal timing, widening intersections, and adding turn lanes.

Stanford has already agreed to a series of programs and projects aimed at lessening traffic impacts, including a $2.25 million payment to the city of Palo Alto to improve pedestrian and bicycle connections from the transit center in downtown Palo Alto to the intersection of El Camino Real and Quarry Road.

Stanford has also agreed to purchase Caltrain "Go passes" for all hospital workers, and to expand its Marguerite bus service.

Stanford officials say the project will bring the medical complex into line with California's seismic requirements, relieve a shortage of hospital beds, add much-needed patient rooms, and enhance the medical and health care facilities and care.

Click here to view the report.

-- Gennady Sheyner contributed to this report.

> Related stories:

Palo Alto seeks 'revenue guarantee' from hospitals

Heyward Robinson asks for 'aggressive' trip reductions

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Sarah
a resident of another community
on May 25, 2010 at 6:38 pm

Drill baby drill!


Like this comment
Posted by Eminent D
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on May 26, 2010 at 6:34 am

"The university will be required to pay a "fair share" toward a long-planned bike and pedestrian underpass at Middle Road in Menlo Park."

Where did this come from?

Does the MP have some private knowledge of the outcome of High Speed Rail?


Like this comment
Posted by susan smith
a resident of Woodside: other
on May 26, 2010 at 10:41 am

Then shouldn't they be in support of high spped rail?


Like this comment
Posted by Gunther Steinberg
a resident of Portola Valley: Ladera
on May 26, 2010 at 3:00 pm

I see no mention of the rush hour congestion on cars coming off and onto I-280 via Sandhill and Alpine Roads as well as Page Mill.
Junipero Serra between Alpine and Page Mill is a crush in the mornings and evenings,and the Page Mill southbound off ramp queue in the mornings is often a mile long on I-280.

Once upon a time (1964) someone had a Willow Expressway on the map, but that was abandoned over MP objections. There is no real connection from 101 via Willow, since it dead ends into a residential area.

I short, the planned expansion of Stanford totally strains the existing infrastructure ever more. Expecting people to come to Stanford on bicycles is a laugh, especially for patients and older employees. People cannot drop into the campus from the air.


Like this comment
Posted by a concerned taxpayer
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on May 26, 2010 at 4:25 pm

"The Willow Expressway" would have put the full brunt of all the traffic on Menlo Park residents. Why not have a Sandhill Expressway connected to University instead? They get the tax benefit so Palo Alto residents should pay for it.


Like this comment
Posted by Local resident
a resident of Menlo Park: University Heights
on May 27, 2010 at 1:37 pm

Don't let the traffic ranters take our eyes off the ball. If Stanford hospitals don't start their seismic upgrades soon--without outrageous demands from Palo Alto and Menlo Park--we will all be without service when the state (or Nature) shuts them down. I was just now jolted by a small quake. What will happen if the hospitals are hit with a Big One before the renovations are completed?

We are used to world-class medicine in our own back yard. Let's keep it that way. The EIR shows a few places where Stanford needs to respond; it clearly omits the cities' efforts to gouge the hospitals.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Let's Talk Internships
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 954 views

Couples: Sex and Connection (Chicken or Egg?)
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 762 views

Zucchini Takeover
By Laura Stec | 1 comment | 709 views