Today: Council meets to peruse cell phone tower site


The Town Council of Portola Valley meets outside at the corner of Golden Oak Drive and Peak Lane at 4 p.m. today (Tuesday, Oct. 12) for a walk around the site of a new cell phone tower proposed by T-Mobile West Corp.

The federal government gives cell phone companies wide latitude in taking the steps necessary to provide full coverage. Using aesthetic grounds as a reason to reject T-Mobile's application for a conditional use permit is a tough case to make under federal guidelines, but that is what the town Planning Commission did in July.

T-Mobile appealed that decision to the Town Council, which will hold a public hearing on the matter Wednesday evening, Oct. 13, at 7:30 p.m. in the Historic Schoolhouse at 765 Portola Road.

The commissioners also questioned the validity of competing maps from T-Mobile and an independent technical firm hired by the town to cross-check the company's claim of gaps in phone coverage.

The town explored alternatives other than a tower, but the outside technical review found alternatives inappropriate. In any case, a court in New York recently ruled that authority as to which technology to use rests with the Federal Communications Commission, not the community.

No neighbors support this tower proposal and the town's Architecture & Site Control Commission rejected a use permit for T-Mobile on a unanimous vote.

Town Planner Tom Vlasic has recommended that the tower, if there is one, be hidden inside a somewhat taller faux pine tree called a monopine.

At the July meeting, Planning Commissioner Alexandra Von Feldt questioned Cal Water's promise to shield the monopine with new trees in place of the trees there now, which are said to be dying. With the rocky soil, it will be "extremely hard, if not impossible, to grow new trees to screen this," Ms. Von Feldt said.

With these trees under duress, Commission Chair Denise Gibson said, "There's going to be a time when you have this 50-to-60-foot (fake) tree sitting there with nothing around it."

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by El Granadian
a resident of another community
on Oct 12, 2010 at 2:24 pm

I understand that in the Half Moon Bay area, citizens voted not to have a cell tower erected because of the citizens who had pace makers and other electrical/medical devices implanted in their bodies, won a judgement that it could not be erected.

[Portion removed. Off topic.]

These people who won the suit also claim that microwave ovens also can kill them or give them cancer.

Unlike Westinghouse's motto for decades, "Progress is not San Mateo County's most important product/attribute".

No doubt, you should be getting a few people interested in their health outcomes before proceeding.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Su Hong Palo Alto's last day of business will be Sept. 29
By Elena Kadvany | 12 comments | 4,314 views

Electric Buses: Challenges and Opportunities
By Sherry Listgarten | 22 comments | 2,676 views

Natural Wines?
By Laura Stec | 1 comment | 881 views

Premarital, Women Over 50 Do Get Married
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 833 views

Stay a part of their day
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 465 views


Register now!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

More Info