Could a huge quake and tsunami, on a scale equal to Japan's, happen here?

Local geologists say no

By Dave Boyce

Almanac Staff Writer

This is an update to an earlier story.

"Everyone's nervous," said Sheldon Breiner, a geophysicist at Stanford University and a resident of Portola Valley who said he's gotten lots of questions from neighbors since the devastating March 11 earthquake and subsequent tsunami off the coast of northeastern Japan.

A common question: Can the Peninsula experience a 9.0 earthquake? "No," Mr. Breiner said. "We might have an 8."

The length and depth of the San Andreas fault are key factors, Mr. Breiner said, as is the fact that the San Andreas ruptures by tectonic plates sliding past one another, a so-called strike-slip fault.

In an interview, U.S. Geological Survey geologist David Schwartz agreed that the San Andreas is limited to magnitude 8, or 7.9 -- if it slips along its entire length of 292 miles. Because it is a relatively shallow 9 miles deep, a larger quake is not possible. Multiplying length times depth, "you don't have enough 'surface area' to slip to produce a magnitude 9," he said.

The dimensions of the crust material involved tends to determine the magnitude of an earthquake. If the San Andreas slips only along the section between the Golden Gate and Los Gatos, for example, the quake likely won't exceed 7.2, Mr. Schwartz said.

Local tsunamis?

Tsunamis occur where a fault is both under water and along a subduction zone, Mr. Breiner said. Earthquakes in a subduction zone like the one off Japan are the result of thrust faults in which one tectonic plate moves on top of another, causing the sea floor to rise.

A rise of 18 or 24 or 30 feet over hundreds of miles will lift an immense quantity of water and create a huge wave, Mr. Schwartz said. By contrast, a strike-slip fault such as the San Andreas "has a very small if any vertical component," he said.

The difference is easily demonstrated with your hand submerged in a bathtub or sink, Mr. Breiner said. Move your hand up or down and the result is a wave. Slide it backward and forward and the surface effect is minimal.

A subduction zone with the potential to generate a tsunami does exist along the West Coast, but it begins at Mendocino County and extends north along the coasts of Oregon and Washington, Mr. Breiner noted.

But, Mr. Schwartz added, a local destructive wave is not out of the question in the case of an underwater landslide. "Strong shaking does have the potential near the coast to set something off," he said.

==N Who's next?==

Another common question concerns the Ring of Fire linking seismic activity to the nations that border the Pacific Ocean. Over the past year, major earthquakes have occurred in Chile, New Zealand and now Japan. Are we next?

"There's no evidence of any kind that I've seen" that shows such a causal relationship, Mr. Breiner said.

"We could have something soon, but there is no connection (with previous quakes)," Mr. Schwartz said. "It's really kind of coincidental. There's no A causing B causing C, which will cause D."

We can't do it without you.
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by Lorrie D
a resident of Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Mar 17, 2011 at 12:36 pm

So let's all get very prepared for the 8.0 quake that is coming our way at some point! 8.0 is very, very powerful indeed. Our thanks to Sheldon Breiner for the expert comparison on the quake/tsunami in Japan and our local geology.

Like this comment
Posted by Lou
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Mar 17, 2011 at 5:07 pm

Good description of the fact that water doesn't support shear motion. Not sure that we can guarantee no 9+ earthquakes here.

Like this comment
Posted by Quaking in me green Irish boots...
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
on Mar 17, 2011 at 5:19 pm

Good question: "Can huge quake and tsunami happen here?"

Short answer: Yes, it can. Pray it's not anytime soon, though.

Especially since a certain group wants to cut the budget of NOAA by 30%.

NOAA runs the tsunami warning center. That's too much big government, apparently.

Web Link

Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle

on Jun 5, 2017 at 4:54 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Don't be the last to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

First Sunnyvale, then Australia: Mountain View's Le Plonc plots expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 2,455 views

Juggling Renewables
By Sherry Listgarten | 35 comments | 1,953 views

Premarital and Couples: Living as Roommates?
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,411 views

Homestead Faire at Hidden Villa 4/27
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 695 views

A trial run
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 530 views


The Almanac Readers' Choice ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "The Almanac Readers' Choice" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 27th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 17th issue of The Almanac.