Atherton agrees to lower hike in trash-collection rates


Garbage rates will go up in Atherton, but not as high as the town first proposed, the City Council decided Wednesday night, March 16, during its regular meeting.

Residents will still pay the highest rates compared with those charged to residents of other towns in the joint powers authority representing 10 Peninsula cities, including Atherton and Menlo Park, and the county.

But rather than rates increasing by 63 percent to 98 percent, depending on the size of a customer's trash can, as first proposed by the town, the new proposed fee schedule will raise garbage collection rates 39 percent for all service levels.

While lowering proposed rates in general, the council raised one proposed fee: Under the new proposal, customers would be charged $5 per green-waste receptacle beyond the standard allocation of two. The original proposal included a $1 charge for each container after the first two.

The vote to lower the rates was 3-2. Although all council members voiced frustration and skepticism over the need to raise rates as high as first proposed, Mayor Jim Dobbie and Councilwoman Kathy McKeithen supported charging the higher rates to move the process forward, noting the town and its residents will be saddled with a growing debt owed to the garbage collection firm, Recology, the longer the rate increase is delayed.

Interim City Manager John Danielson said the town will have to go through another lengthy public noticing process, and hold another hearing, meaning it is unlikely the new rates will go into effect before July. Changing the originally proposed rates could delay the rate hike even more.

It was agreed that more questions needed answering about Recology's costs to provide service to the town and other factors driving rates up, and if the higher rates couldn't be supported when further analysis was completed, they could be lowered later, some council members noted.

Under the new proposal, service for a 20-gallon garbage can would cost $24.04 per month, rather than $28.22, as earlier proposed. Service on a 32-gallon can would cost $38.46, rather than the earlier-proposed $45.15. The most costly level of service, a 96-gallon can, would cost $114.15 per month, rather than $162.53.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by peter carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Mar 17, 2011 at 12:25 pm

peter carpenter is a registered user.

These rates will simply not cover the costs plus profit which the (horrible) contract guarantees Recology and the Town will have to make up the difference (called 'truing up"). Since the Town is already running a deficit that truing up can only come from much higher future fees or another parcel tax.

Like this comment
Posted by Ed
a resident of Atherton: other
on Mar 17, 2011 at 1:00 pm

Is this why the Police Department has recently secured a defined percentage of the parcel tax? I believe that I saw some figures in the press just last week that stated 60% of the parcel tax will be designated for the APD and 40% for anything else the town needs--I believe that has traditionally not been a set portioning.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

After experiencing harassment, owner of Zareen's restaurants speaks out about Islamophobia, racism
By Elena Kadvany | 28 comments | 8,116 views

Good News: The New Menlo Park Rail Subcommittee Hits A Home Run
By Dana Hendrickson | 12 comments | 1,720 views

Premarital and Couples: Tips for Hearing (Listening) and Being Known
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,338 views

Two degrees can do all that?
By Sherry Listgarten | 2 comments | 855 views

Tame, Maim and Claim the Wild Sea Vegetable
By Laura Stec | 1 comment | 440 views


Register today!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More