Menlo Park pulls balancing act with budget


For years, council watchers have called for a balanced Menlo Park budget. Now they might finally get what they want, but will it be a case of "be careful what you wish for?"

The balancing act

The adjusted budget for fiscal year 2010-11 shows a $571,675 deficit between revenue and expenses; the proposed budget resets that difference to zero. City Manager Glen Rojas' presentation during the May 23 council meeting drilled down into the details of how the city can force expenditures back into line with revenue. The report cautioned the council that a balanced budget doesn't equal a sustainable budget, at least in part due to short-term strategies no one wants to resort to forever.


-- Paying off $7.16 million unfunded public safety pension liability with CalPERS, at the suggestion of Councilman Peter Ohtaki, saved $828,000 for the fiscal year 2011-12, and $3.6 million in interest overall.

-- Fee increases expected to boost general fund revenue by $212,000 for the coming fiscal year.

-- Converting two sworn police officer positions to less-costly community service officer slots, to save $220,000.

-- Labor negotiations that the city hopes will follow in the footsteps of the newly approved police sergeants contract.

-- Outsourcing one custodial position to save $27,000 and contracting with Team Sheeper for pool operations, and considering doing the same for grounds maintenance.

-- Transferring a half-time position from business development to engineering, saving $60,000, and freezing a part-time teacher position at the Menlo Children's Center.

-- Short-term maneuvers such as buying fewer library books and cutting back staff training. Slashing library support inspired the library commission to protest. In a letter to council on May 24, the commission listed five funding sources that will either dry up or reduce contributions by as much as 77 percent to a library system already struggling with limited hours, materials, and programs.

Safe for now

Breakfast with Santa dodged the budget bullet, as staff recommended leaving "special events" alone, which run up an annual tab of $105,000.

So did a 3 percent pay cut for the 77 city employees earning more than $100,000 which drew criticism from Councilman Andy Cohen, who said sacrifice and leadership need to start at the top. Joining colleague Kelly Fergusson, he stated his opposition "taking people at the bottom of the ladder and dumping them by privatizing or contracting them out."

Sore points

Staff considered reducing the $25,000 budgeted to support the city's use of the Menlo-Atherton Performing Arts Center -- Menlo Park contributed $2.6 million to build the center in 2008 -- because of problems coordinating events with the school and unanticipated costs, such as paying custodians, technicians, and school staff. Instead, they recommended using an events planner to better leverage the property.

The city's high-speed rail lobbyist, Ravi Mehta, was less fortunate. After a spirited council debate, with Vice Mayor Kirsten Keith leading the charge for defunding the position, the council voted 3-1, with Ms. Fergusson dissenting and Mr. Cohen recused, to slice the budget in half to $50,000. Menlo Park and Palo Alto share expenses for the lobbyist.

Not final

Finer points of budgetary tweaking remain up for negotiation. Menlo Park may or may not adjust the utility users and transient occupancy taxes, for example. The city may or may not take Flood Park from the county, but now that the county has extended its deadline for closing the park by six months, both sides have time to plan a transition.

Those fine points may provoke discussion again when the proposed budget returns to the council on June 14 for adoption.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by PALLBEAR
a resident of another community
on Jun 1, 2011 at 1:19 pm

If I am not mistaken, wasn't a major company borne in Menlo Park just a few years ago? TESLA MOTORS or engineering which got a half billion dollar loan and then moved to Palo Alto?
They were HEADLINERS for a year on the ALMANAC and it appears that the company is in some kind of financial trouble and is closing by the end of the year, after getting government support.
THIS is news. Why is it not front page stuff with details?
It was a MENLO PARK home story?
Palo Alto seems to have been involved also. Does any of this come back to you?
Could it have any financial involvement with possibly borrowing from your budget when it first started?
No matter what, it is obviously being swept under the deep pile.

Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Jun 1, 2011 at 3:30 pm

Doesn't sound like they're going out of business to me:

Web Link

Like this comment
Posted by peter carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jun 1, 2011 at 3:38 pm

peter carpenter is a registered user.

Just chalk up one more point against PALLBEAR/R.Gordon's credibility.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

After experiencing harassment, owner of Zareen's restaurants speaks out about Islamophobia, racism
By Elena Kadvany | 28 comments | 7,543 views

Don't Miss Your Exit (and other lessons from an EV drive)
By Sherry Listgarten | 14 comments | 2,494 views

Goodbye Food Waste!
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 2,441 views

Good News: The New Menlo Park Rail Subcommittee Hits A Home Run
By Dana Hendrickson | 12 comments | 1,629 views

Premarital and Couples: Tips for Hearing (Listening) and Being Known
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,011 views


Register today!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More