Menlo Park home cuts energy use by 90 percent


By Caitlin Moyles

Special to the Almanac

Insulation, airtight window frames, solar power, and a heat-recovery ventilation system helped Clarum Homes earn its first certification for building a passive house that the company says cuts energy use by 90 percent.

Several hundred guests, including architects and engineers, toured the home, located at 1206 North Lemon Ave. in Menlo Park, and asked about its environmental and health benefits on June 2, five days before the 4-bedroom, 3.5-bath house goes on the market.

John Suppes, CEO of Clarum Homes, along with Director of Construction Sean Misskelley and consultant Katy Hollbacher, guided visitors through the 3,300-square-foot, Mission-style home and answered questions, while visitors mingled over a sandwich buffet.

The airtight, energy-efficient home needs 90 percent less energy annually for heating than the average U.S. household, Mr. Suppes said. He added that although the California-based company has built passive-inspired houses in the past, this is its first home to meet all standards -- set by Passive House Institute US (PHIUS) -- for space-heating demand and total energy use per square foot, as well as airtightness.

Structural insulated panels retain heat by using the same material as Styrofoam coffee cups, and triple-glazed windowpanes from Austria create a thermal envelope that reduces heating costs, he said. Sealants and a liquid barrier applied to the outside of the panels maintain airtightness.

Air inside the house goes through a heat recovery ventilator that keeps temperature and humidity constant by exchanging the air nine times every 24 hours, and recovering 90 percent of the heat from air exhausted to the outside of the house, said Matt Groves, an engineer for the company that supplied the ventilator.

The home also cuts energy costs by using three solar panels on the roof to provide 90 percent of the power needed to heat water, and 40 percent to heat space, according to Clarum. In addition, solar tubes replace ceiling lights in dark areas such as closets.

Although the passive house cost 4 to 5 percent more to build than normal Clarum homes, which also feature sustainable technologies, energy savings will recapture the cost, Mr. Suppes said. He plans to build and retrofit several passive houses for clients in Menlo Park and Palo Alto in the near future.

Ms. Hollbacher emphasized that a home earns certification from PHIUS as a passive house based on the building's performance, rather than prescribed features.

"Something that's really nice about the standard is that there are three absolute numbers for heat demand, energy use, and air tightness. It doesn't matter if you're in Germany, or if you're in Minnesota, Truckee, or (Menlo Park), you have to meet them," she said, adding that because the passive house standards were developed in Germany, they're relatively easy to achieve in California's mild climate.

Although passive house regulations don't include a standard for water efficiency -- an area which Clarum addressed in its Menlo Park house with structured zone plumbing, a recirculating hot water system that reduces time spent waiting for water to heat, and drought-resistant plants -- Mr. Suppes and Ms. Hollbacher said they believe the passive house standard is currently the most advanced standard for green building. "There's just no reason not to do this," Ms. Hollbacher said.

Visit for more information about the Menlo passive house.

Visit to learn more about the construction standards.

We can't do it without you.
Support local journalism.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Don't be the last to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Rose International Market reopening soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 12 comments | 5,205 views

Eyes and the End of Life: Why Spend Time With the Dying?
By Aldis Petriceks | 2 comments | 1,834 views

The HSR Decision
By Steve Levy | 8 comments | 1,135 views

Couples: Mirror, Mirror on the . . . Fight?!
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 852 views

What should Menlo Park’s priorities be?
By Dana Hendrickson | 1 comment | 546 views