Portola Valley: No leads in oak tree beheadings

About 25 oak trees were topped near the 500 block of Portola Road

Click on picture to enlarge.

By Dave Boyce

Almanac Staff Writer

Violence was done to the tops of about 25 oak trees late last year along the 500 block of Portola Road in Portola Valley, a town known for its pride in its trees, and particularly its oak trees. The perpetrator left the branches lying at the base of the damaged trees and in the nearby field, a town landmark known as the Neely/Myers meadow.

Topping trees like this on open space land without permission is a misdemeanor, said Brian Malone, an area supervisor for the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, in an interview. The open space district has police powers and owns the part of the meadow where the trees reside, but without leads as to who cut the trees, the district is not pursuing a prosecution, Mr. Malone said.

The district learned of the incident in a report dated Dec. 10, 2010, written by a ranger who participated in an investigation in response to someone who called the office about it on Nov. 30, Mr. Malone said.

"I did not see any leads," Mr. Malone said, reflecting on his visit to the site. The topping probably involved a boom truck and was probably done in broad daylight when such operations are inconspicuous, he said. It was unusual, he added, in that the cut branches were not chipped a common practice of professional tree cutters.

The result is a massive hedge. The trees compensate for the damage on top by growing horizontally, further obscuring the view of Windy Hill and nearby hills for pedestrians, cyclists and drivers on Portola Road.

That particular view of the hills has been a matter of concern for the town's Conservation Committee, member Paul Heiple said. The committee has considered recommendations to the district on thinning these trees, all of which sprouted spontaneously, as well as getting rid of the non-native trees and allowing the remaining oaks to grow apart from each other, Mr. Heiple said. The current hedge-like pattern "wouldn't happen in nature," he said.

At the time of the topping incident, Mr. Heiple said the committee received a call from the open space district asking if members knew of the perpetrator, which they said they did not.

Mr. Malone said he visited every residence that might have a potential interest in seeing the tree heights lowered and interviewed someone on each visit. No one would admit to involvement, he said. He would not say whom he talked to.

The illegal topping operation will probably be done again when the new growth reaches its old height, Mr. Malone said. When that happens, after having spread the word about this incident, there may be more eyes and ears on the lookout, including those of district rangers. "Hopefully we can catch the person in the act," Mr. Malone said.

Mayor Ted Driscoll, when asked for a comment, said he learned of it recently in an overheard hallway conversation. "Obviously, I don't condone it," he said. "It's obviously a misdemeanor. It's obviously against the law to do that."

It's also a long-term problem, he added, and said he knows of a half dozen incidents in town when residents appear to have cut the tops off trees on someone else's land to improve the view from their own homes. Even one of the redwood groves at Town Center had this done to it surreptitiously about 18 years ago, Mr. Driscoll said.

"I'm sympathetic with the open space district," he said. "I'm unhappy when I see trees being treated like topiary."

"Treat us like you would another neighbor," Mr. Malone told the Almanac. "A reasonable person wouldn't go to a neighbor and chop down a tree for a view. Please treat open space as your neighbor and be respectful of the vegetation and land on the other side of the fence."

We can't do it without you.
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Aug 23, 2011 at 1:30 pm

Make it a felony. Or better yet make the crime of illegally topping a tree punishable by gullotine. It's only fitting.

Like this comment
Posted by sabyn
a resident of Portola Valley: Westridge
on Aug 24, 2011 at 9:48 am

people are just crazy about their view. they'll do anything to improve it. this nut job tree topper needs to find a new hobby

Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Aug 24, 2011 at 12:55 pm

Years ago when Joe Montana lived on Valpariso on the Atherton side his new neighbor to the east topped Joe's trees along the property so he could get more sunlight. Without Joe's permission of course.

Like this comment
Posted by curious
a resident of another community
on Aug 25, 2011 at 3:02 pm

Given that a boom truck was likely used, did they consider contacting the local tree trimming firms and asking them if they were involved in the matter?

Like this comment
Posted by lisa
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Aug 25, 2011 at 3:19 pm

I agree there should be harsher fines and punishments for "tree" crimes, and the current laws should be more strictly enforced. Besides that, what sort of person gets any pleasure from destroying trees. Sick fcks!.

Like this comment
Posted by Eric
a resident of Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
on Aug 27, 2011 at 12:07 am

Having lived next to a stand of ugly eucalyptus trees for over ten years, I can understand the frustration of neighbors when they lose sunlight on their property and see their plants die due to lack of light and loss of water. Illegal tree topping would not occur if people were considerate of their neighbors' views and need for sunlight.

I drove past my former home about a year ago. The eucalyptus trees still had not been trimmed and looked like even more of a storm and fire hazard. I wouldn't blame someone for topping those trees.

The real answer would be a requirement that tree owners did not let their trees negatively affect other properties in the neighborhood.

Like this comment
Posted by Marie
a resident of Woodside: other
on Aug 27, 2011 at 12:19 am

For some of us open space also means an open view. Trees need to be maintained. Trimming trees is important to the trees' health. Allowing trees to grow unchecked is akin to neglecting them. Neglected trees fall down in storms and can even kill a passerby.

Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Aug 27, 2011 at 10:29 am

Eric and Marie
It's called nature.
You have a choice don't buy a home next a tree.
By the way topping a tree totally screws up the branch and root systems.
Just take a look at street trees in Menlo Park which were planted under power lines and topped by PG&E.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Don't be the last to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Downtown Palo Alto gets new Vietnamese eatery
By Elena Kadvany | 15 comments | 6,642 views

On Metaphor and Mortality
By Aldis Petriceks | 0 comments | 1,224 views

Premarital and Existing Couples: Marriage Rules: Yours, Mine, or Ours?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,077 views

Big Island Food Party!
By Laura Stec | 11 comments | 950 views

Looking for Leaks
By Sherry Listgarten | 0 comments | 624 views