Ideas for greenhouse gas reduction?


Got a vision for a greener Menlo Park? The city has posted a survey online to solicit ideas on what the criteria should be for adopting a greenhouse gas reduction target.

Go to here to complete the survey. Responses are due by Wednesday, Nov. 30.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by Futurist
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Nov 23, 2011 at 5:30 pm

Build more housing downtown. Green house gases from local and long commutes are greatly reduced.

Our council, in it wisdom, is eliminating housing from the new downtown plan. They claim it will be too tall and diminish the 'village chracter'. We need people to show up at the council meetings and fight for more housing downtown, a fundamentally green feature.

Like this comment
Posted by SERF
a resident of another community
on Nov 25, 2011 at 8:25 am

This area lost it's "village" feeling before it began.
A truly good example of good planning was Westwood Village in West L.A. as designed by the Janss family who designated the property to UCLA and has kept the feeling of a place with culture and taste and near Bel Air and Holmby Hills....truly better designed with good taste and grand homes and strong police force.
The peninsula is a poor comparison unless one examines the design origins of Stanford University and where the monies and architecture originated.

Like this comment
Posted by height isn't the problem
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Nov 25, 2011 at 10:57 am

The issue isn't height. The reason there won't be much housing is that the new plan allows a lot more office buildings than what can be built now. Those give developers more profits than housing or stores. The council could limit offices to current allowed levels but cares more for whatever developers want than for what keeps Menlo Park a residential community

Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Nov 25, 2011 at 12:11 pm

If office space made money the building at the corner of Watkins and El Camino wouldn't still be sitting empty and the same developer wouldn't have had the old Gaylord's property foreclosed on.

Like this comment
Posted by height isn't the problem
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Nov 25, 2011 at 2:28 pm

MV - really? Since Stanford kicked out its medical tenants on Welch Rd, demand has been high for medical offices. Perhaps that developer wasn't managed well? Perhaps the building design isn't suitable? Perhaps the rent is too high?
My comment was about the long haul and the fact that to a developer office space is more profitable than housing or stores . Not much development is happening right now anywhere but that will pick up as the economy does and as credit loosens.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Don't be the last to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Natural wine bar Salvaje opens in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,827 views

Cap On? Cap Off? Recycling Bottles is Confusing
By Laura Stec | 41 comments | 1,706 views

Premarital and Couples: "Our Deepest Fear" by Marianne Williamson
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,463 views

Everything you've always wanted to know ...
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 1,038 views

The Menlo Park Planning For Civic Projects Needs A Major Reboot. (Part 1)
By Dana Hendrickson | 1 comment | 42 views