Slocum ballot revised after complaint

Language challenged by opposing candidate Keith

Candidates for political office are expected to sing their own praises in hopes of swaying voters, but there are rules regarding what they can say, rules that county Board of Supervisors candidate Warren Slocum got a refresher lesson on this week.

Ballot statements and designations are meant to briefly summarize a candidate's qualifications for office. Once the 10-day public review of the statements and designations commenced on March 9, a couple eagle-eyed Menlo Park residents spotted a mistake in Mr. Slocum's, and wasted no time before protesting.

Apparently Mr. Slocum's original language may have created the impression that he was still the county's elections officer by stating, "As your Chief Elections Officer and Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder...," an error the candidate described as unintentional.

Although elsewhere in his statement he included the abbreviation "ret." -- for "retired" -- the complaint stated that voters might overlook or not understand the shorthand.

"Mr. Slocum attempted to file a ballot designation that was not permitted under the law," said Menlo Park Mayor Kirsten Keith, who is also running for the Board of Supervisors, in a press release. "I raised objections with San Mateo County and they agreed that his ballot designation was improper. Mr. Slocum was forced to change it. Additionally, I objected to some of the language Mr. Slocum used in his ballot statement to describe his former position with the County and San Mateo County Counsel agreed with that objection also and went to court to get this language changed."

The county's current election officer, Mark Church, filed the complaint in San Mateo County Superior Court on March 19. A judge agreed with the concerns and ruled that the language should be tweaked to insert the word "former" where appropriate.

A former county clerk-recorder-assessor and chief elections officer, Mr. Slocum was first elected to public office in 1986 and served until January 2011. He said it certainly was not his intent to try to make anyone think he was still in office. "I did put the abbreviation for retired in there," he said. " If I'd had the intent of being sneaky I certainly wouldn't have put 'ret' up top in the very first line."

Ms. Keith described the incident very disturbing and commented in a press release, "This was either a deliberate act or a negligent oversight, and either is very troublesome for someone who was in charge of enforcing election laws and is now a candidate for Supervisor."

For his part, Mr. Slocum said he's been around long enough to know that during a campaign, people try to divert other campaigns away from the main issues. He remains focused on "talking to people and raising money and getting endorsements and the issues. This is a little bit of drama, but it's sorted out now and maybe we can move on."

He is one of eight candidates for termed-out Supervisor Rose Jacobs Gibson's seat. The district she represents includes Menlo Park, Redwood City, East Palo Alto and unincorporated North Fair Oaks and Oak Knoll.


Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Observer
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:21 pm

[Post removed.]

Like this comment
Posted by Sue
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:57 pm

To Menlo Observer: Who is the "her" you are referring to above, whose appearance has approved dramatically?

Like this comment
Posted by RS
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 21, 2012 at 2:32 pm

I have not yet considered any of candidates for Supervisor. However, I consider Ms. Keith's quote as indicating a rather petty individual, certainly not one meriting my vote.

Like this comment
Posted by Gail Slocum
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:22 pm

Dear "Menlo Observer"

The "Slocum" to whom Ms. Keith and this Almanac article refers is Mr. Warren Slocum, a former County official who recently decided to run for Supervisor, not me, Gail SLocum, Former Mayor of Menlo Park.

Though we happen to have the same last name, Warren Slocum is not a direct relative of mine. And I am not running for office. So kindly keep your facts straight.

Also, please consider stating your name in future postings, and perhaps think about whether we all might not benefit from a greater measure of overall kindness in our community, including on Town Square. It's better for the overall level of discourse to maintain a higher degree of civility than the anonymous postings here too often appear to engender.


Gail Slocum
Former Mayor, Menlo Park

Like this comment
Posted by Laura
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:36 pm

Kudos to Gail Slocum. Although I can't use my full name on this forum for complicated reasons, I do support the call for civility and getting one's facts straight. And by the way, where's the editor who's supposed to remove personal attacks?

Like this comment
Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Mar 21, 2012 at 6:51 pm

I don't understand why this went to court in the first place. Mark Church and his office could have corrected this on there own.

Like this comment
Posted by Outraged at Slocum's Hypocrisy
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Mar 24, 2012 at 3:53 pm

[Post removed; off topic]

Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Mar 24, 2012 at 4:40 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

[Post removed; refers to post taken off line.]

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 4,687 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 1,119 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 585 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 483 views