Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Candidates for political office are expected to sing their own praises in hopes of swaying voters, but there are rules regarding what they can say, rules that county Board of Supervisors candidate Warren Slocum got a refresher lesson on this week.

Ballot statements and designations are meant to briefly summarize a candidate’s qualifications for office. Once the 10-day public review of the statements and designations commenced on March 9, a couple eagle-eyed Menlo Park residents spotted a mistake in Mr. Slocum’s, and wasted no time before protesting.

Apparently Mr. Slocum’s original language may have created the impression that he was still the county’s elections officer by stating, “As your Chief Elections Officer and Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder…,” an error the candidate described as unintentional.

Although elsewhere in his statement he included the abbreviation “ret.” — for “retired” — the complaint stated that voters might overlook or not understand the shorthand.

“Mr. Slocum attempted to file a ballot designation that was not permitted under the law,” said Menlo Park Mayor Kirsten Keith, who is also running for the Board of Supervisors, in a press release. “I raised objections with San Mateo County and they agreed that his ballot designation was improper. Mr. Slocum was forced to change it. Additionally, I objected to some of the language Mr. Slocum used in his ballot statement to describe his former position with the County and San Mateo County Counsel agreed with that objection also and went to court to get this language changed.”

The county’s current election officer, Mark Church, filed the complaint in San Mateo County Superior Court on March 19. A judge agreed with the concerns and ruled that the language should be tweaked to insert the word “former” where appropriate.

A former county clerk-recorder-assessor and chief elections officer, Mr. Slocum was first elected to public office in 1986 and served until January 2011. He said it certainly was not his intent to try to make anyone think he was still in office. “I did put the abbreviation for retired in there,” he said. ” If I’d had the intent of being sneaky I certainly wouldn’t have put ‘ret’ up top in the very first line.”

Ms. Keith described the incident very disturbing and commented in a press release, “This was either a deliberate act or a negligent oversight, and either is very troublesome for someone who was in charge of enforcing election laws and is now a candidate for Supervisor.”

For his part, Mr. Slocum said he’s been around long enough to know that during a campaign, people try to divert other campaigns away from the main issues. He remains focused on “talking to people and raising money and getting endorsements and the issues. This is a little bit of drama, but it’s sorted out now and maybe we can move on.”

He is one of eight candidates for termed-out Supervisor Rose Jacobs Gibson’s seat. The district she represents includes Menlo Park, Redwood City, East Palo Alto and unincorporated North Fair Oaks and Oak Knoll.

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. This is not the first time Slocum has caused trouble in Menlo Park. However, after seeing her at the candidates’ forum last night I must admit that her appearance has improved dramatically.

    It is also nice to see Keith prevail over Slocum again.

  2. I have not yet considered any of candidates for Supervisor. However, I consider Ms. Keith’s quote as indicating a rather petty individual, certainly not one meriting my vote.

  3. Dear “Menlo Observer”

    The “Slocum” to whom Ms. Keith and this Almanac article refers is Mr. Warren Slocum, a former County official who recently decided to run for Supervisor, not me, Gail SLocum, Former Mayor of Menlo Park.

    Though we happen to have the same last name, Warren Slocum is not a direct relative of mine. And I am not running for office. So kindly keep your facts straight.

    Also, please consider stating your name in future postings, and perhaps think about whether we all might not benefit from a greater measure of overall kindness in our community, including on Town Square. It’s better for the overall level of discourse to maintain a higher degree of civility than the anonymous postings here too often appear to engender.

    Thanks,

    Gail Slocum
    Former Mayor, Menlo Park

  4. Kudos to Gail Slocum. Although I can’t use my full name on this forum for complicated reasons, I do support the call for civility and getting one’s facts straight. And by the way, where’s the editor who’s supposed to remove personal attacks?

  5. I don’t understand why this went to court in the first place. Mark Church and his office could have corrected this on there own.

  6. Gail Slocum has been misleading people during City Council elections for twenty years. Her last victim was Chuck Bernstein done as a favor for Dave Bohannon for his montstrous development in Belle Haven. And of course she mislead everyone on the carbon footrprint, conveniently leaving out all the emissions cause by automobiles coming to and from the Bohannon development.

    She suggested that Chuck Bernstein was the Tea Party’s man. Of course that was not true. But the unctuous Slocum merely suggested it. She does not lie. She only misleads. And that his been her modus operandi for the past 20 years. So when she complains that someone is besmirching her reputation, believe me she deserves it.

    She is the master of dirty tricks.

  7. Outraged – please have enough intelligence and courtesy to read the topic before you post something which is off topic and totally irrelevant.

Leave a comment