Belle Haven after-school program buys time

Council challenges parents to find solutions

Where Menlo Park staff saw a win-win, parents saw a lose-lose. The Menlo Park City Council decided on May 22 to give parents a year to make their case as to why the city shouldn't let a nonprofit take over its Belle Haven after-school program.

The merger would save the city about $192,000 next year, making it an enticing proposition in tough budgetary times. Although the subsidized Belle Haven program wasn't funded by the city's dissolved redevelopment agency, it does tie up general funds that Menlo Park now needs to pay four police officers, according to staff.

Parents relying on the Belle Haven program outlined what the merger would cost them: transportation of children from bus stops to the program's home at the Onetta Harris Community Center; hot snacks; children separated by age; a low adult to student ratio; and a family atmosphere appropriate to younger children instead of one skewed toward the older teens who go to the nonprofit, the Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula.

One speaker listed three reasons for the council to keep the Belle Haven program. Beechwood principal Dave Laurence praised the program's "safe and productive environment" and the number of students who return after graduation to help give back to the program that helped them. "Lastly, any time you take the ratio of adults to students and increase that to the point where there's just supervision, you lose the relationship," he said. "Forming a bond equals a positive thing."

Parents also criticized the city's lack of outreach. Staff sent out one survey about the closure, they said, but that was it.

Mayor Kirsten Keith said she thought the city could do better by sitting down to talk with the parents.

After discussing the finer points of the proposed budget, council members asked staff to give the Belle Haven program another year time enough for the parents to either figure out how to lower costs or make other arrangements for their children.

"I want to extend a challenge to the parents of the after-school program and teachers -- you've got to help us with that solution," Councilwoman Kelly Fergusson said, and noted that the program is in direct competition with public safety for funding. "We've got to keep those police services up!"


Like this comment
Posted by menlo voter
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on May 31, 2012 at 9:32 am

Prevention is the best medicine. Perhaps if the mayor spent more time and resources working with these children we would need less police in the future.

Like this comment
Posted by SaraMP
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on May 31, 2012 at 12:19 pm

Access to affordable, high-quality childcare is one of the things that makes Menlo Park so attractive to families. Dismantling Belle Haven's childcare program is amazingly shortsighted. The city needs to do better by its most vulnerable residents. Sending little kids off to be warehoused by the Boys & Girls Club is a shameful plan.

Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of another community
on May 31, 2012 at 12:41 pm

I agree w/both commenters. I truly hope that when this is revisited, it's not an option to get rid of it.

Does Menlo really need more cops? Are some retiring or leaving the dept., leaving a deficit of officers?

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 849 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 605 views