News


Portola Valley meets on affordable housing site

 

The Portola Valley Town Council plans to meet in closed session at 5 p.m. Monday, July 2, to discuss the terms for acquiring the 1.68-acre parcel at 900 Portola Road, the former home of Al's Nursery, where the town might build housing affordable to those with moderate incomes.

Town Attorney Sandy Sloan and council member Ann Wengert will negotiate with property owners Geoff and Colleen Tate, the town announced.

The discussion will include parcels owned by the town in the Blue Oaks subdivision. Officials have talked about selling the parcels to finance the purchase of the former nursery property.

The meeting takes place in the Historic Schoolhouse at 765 Portola Road in Portola Valley.

Click here to download the agenda.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by question
a resident of Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Jul 2, 2012 at 12:54 pm

I thought i saw a story a year or so ago that this site was going to be the new site for the Windmill Preschool. What happened to that deal?


Like this comment
Posted by huh?
a resident of Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Jul 2, 2012 at 1:34 pm

I thought that Windmill School was buying this land? And were working together with the Town? Did Windmill back off, or is the Town being aggressive and competing (after cooperating) or did the seller's change their approach?


Like this comment
Posted by Lane-Jacobson
a resident of Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
on Jul 5, 2012 at 4:32 pm

Moved to P.V. 48 years ago, (now Woodside) as the mail service changed our town back and forth several times. We have 5 acres on the corner of Portola Road and Farm Road. As the Town of Portola Valley is willing to get into the real estate and development business, perhaps we should look into selling our 5 acres to Woodside, knowing they too have been unable to fulfill the BMR request of the state. They could fit 40 homes on our land, perhaps resulting in 80 more cars trying to access Portola Road during morning rush hour. This would also allow 160 more people to live and work here, and approximately 400 more kids to go to the P.V. schools. I just hope the town doesn't get sued for anything, like kids falling into the creek, as no fences are allowed on the wild life corridor. If so-would the town then have to tax residents for millions of dollars to pay for all this? Am also wondering if any of this is legal, and how many on the town council live near this proposed project that would certainly devalue all near by properties.


Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle

on Jun 4, 2017 at 6:34 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 18 comments | 5,027 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 1,224 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 757 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 573 views