News

Editorial: Binding arbitration leaves public in dark

 

Menlo Park and at least 15 other jurisdictions in California rely on binding arbitration to resolve police disciplinary cases.

The Almanac spent five months investigating the process to find out how Officer Jeffrey Vasquez got his job back, with $188,000 in back pay, despite being fired after he was caught naked with a prostitute in a motel room, and admitting, according to the police report, that it wasn't his first time soliciting a hooker for sex.

The Almanac found that:

* No state agency has oversight of the binding arbitration process. The state doesn't track how many times arbitrators overturn or uphold employee discipline, and doesn't keep a centralized database of their rulings. In short, no one knows how well or how badly binding arbitration works in California, particularly in police misconduct cases.

* The arbitrator's decision can be legally and factually wrong, and it's still binding.

* A sampling of 17 police arbitration decisions in California obtained by the Almanac revealed that in nearly 59 percent of the cases, arbitrators overturned disciplinary actions against police officers. That pattern corresponds with statistics from other cities, such as Houston and Chicago.

Efforts to examine the arbitration decision in a specific case smashes into a wall of secrecy, thanks to confidentiality laws that prohibit public agencies from commenting on personnel disciplinary actions.

The criminal case against Jeffrey Vasquez ended after the officer pleaded not guilty to a misdemeanor charge of solicitation, and the court dismissed the case for a procedural issue.

Details of the binding arbitration case -- even the name of the arbitrator -- came to light only after the police officer's attorney published a column about how he won the case. The attorney claimed the city erred in its investigation, an assertion denied by police officers involved in the investigation. The arbitrator declined to comment on the case or whether the column accurately described his ruling.

Menlo Park carries the secrecy even further than the law requires, refusing to release information that it could disclose, such as how many police officers have faced discipline and how many cases have gone to binding arbitration. In contrast, San Jose posts annual reports on employee disciplinary actions, and the final outcome if appealed, on its public website, stripped of identifying information to remain within the law. Where Menlo Park looks for reasons to turn down a public records request, San Jose and other jurisdictions look for ways to say yes, in keeping with the spirit of transparency laws.

The Menlo Park City Council is currently negotiating next year's contract with the police officers' union. The council should seriously consider eliminating binding arbitration in favor of a civilian review board or administrative panel like that found in other cities.

It's also time for the city to stop hiding information about employee disciplinary cases that can legally be disclosed, such as the number of actions and the outcomes. When the Almanac asked several months ago how many police officers have been fired in recent years, the city claimed it didn't keep track. It's time to start, and to make that information available to the public, which has a vested interest in the performance of all city employees.

Finally, state legislators also need to step up and examine whether to make it easier for a public agency to appeal an arbitrator's ruling. They can also push to create a database of arbitration decisions, accessible to at least the attorneys handling these cases, as well as statistics available to everyone for evaluating the system's effectiveness.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Questions
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jun 4, 2013 at 7:24 am

Why is there an editorial on this without any indication of what City Council members have said in response to this criticism? Has the Almanac talked to Council members about this?


Like this comment
Posted by Michael G Stogner
a resident of another community
on Jun 4, 2013 at 7:34 am

This is the public's business, Almanac thank you for this article.

No oversight of Binding Arbitration, therein lies the problem

The above example shows 59% of 17 cases the arbitrators overturned disciplinary actions against police officers. It's that simple


Like this comment
Posted by Questions
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jun 4, 2013 at 11:54 am

It's not an article, it's an editorial. It seems like it would be good to know whether the author of the editorial is working from the same set of facts from the Council. Has the author even spoken to anyone on.the Council?


Like this comment
Posted by long time resident
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Jun 5, 2013 at 2:10 pm

The Menlo Park police department needs to be more transparent. If they want the community to trust them, they need to share information pertinent to the community they serve, such as the behavior of the officers and how many have been terminated and disciplined. I also agree that they need to do away with binding arbitration since as demonstrated in the case of Jeffrey Vasquez it does not work. I think common sense dictates that an officer who is on duty and commits a crime, such as soliciting a prostitute, should be terminated.


Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jun 5, 2013 at 2:52 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Binding arbitration has no place in a public agency.

Elected officials were elected to represent the citizens, arbitrators are accountable to no one.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

After 39 years of cakes and pastries, Palo Alto institution Prolific Oven to close
By Elena Kadvany | 56 comments | 17,766 views

Local Transit to the Rescue?
By Sherry Listgarten | 19 comments | 2,357 views

The Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Process Explained
By Steve Levy | 10 comments | 1,596 views

"You Gotta Have Balls [to do counseling] . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,384 views

How to end the summer
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 691 views

 

Register now!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

More info