News

Eshoo votes to defund NSA phone program

But the amendment failed by a vote of 205 to 217

Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, D-Menlo Park, voted Wednesday in favor of an amendment to the 2014 defense spending bill that would require the National Security Agency (NSA) to limit its information-gathering to subjects of national security investigations, rather than all Americans.

The amendment, which would have defunded the NSA's domestic phone metadata program, failed by a vote of 205 to 217. The final tally was 94 Republicans and 111 Democrats in favor, and 134 Republicans and 83 Democrats opposed.

"It was never the intent of Congress in passing the Patriot Act to allow for a dragnet surveillance program that captures the communications of all Americans," said Rep. Eshoo, a former eight-year member of the House Intelligence Committee.

"I recognize that our counter-terrorism agencies need investigative tools to keep us safe, but the (Obama) Administration's indiscriminate seizure of phone records unnecessarily tramples personal privacy and civil liberties. The critical balance between national security and the constitutional rights of the American people must always be honored."

The vote follows the disclosure of information about the NSA's surveillance programs, which have been collecting both Internet data and phone records from all Americans. The NSA does this under a section of the 2001 Patriot Act that allows the government to collect such information if it certifies to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the records are "relevant" to a foreign intelligence or international terrorism investigation.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Almanac Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

"My vote barring the NSA from engaging in blanket surveillance programs was aimed at reforming how the NSA carries out its responsibilities to protect our country, minus a massive dragnet," Rep. Eshoo said.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Follow AlmanacNews.com and The Almanac on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Eshoo votes to defund NSA phone program

But the amendment failed by a vote of 205 to 217

Uploaded: Wed, Jul 24, 2013, 5:52 pm

Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, D-Menlo Park, voted Wednesday in favor of an amendment to the 2014 defense spending bill that would require the National Security Agency (NSA) to limit its information-gathering to subjects of national security investigations, rather than all Americans.

The amendment, which would have defunded the NSA's domestic phone metadata program, failed by a vote of 205 to 217. The final tally was 94 Republicans and 111 Democrats in favor, and 134 Republicans and 83 Democrats opposed.

"It was never the intent of Congress in passing the Patriot Act to allow for a dragnet surveillance program that captures the communications of all Americans," said Rep. Eshoo, a former eight-year member of the House Intelligence Committee.

"I recognize that our counter-terrorism agencies need investigative tools to keep us safe, but the (Obama) Administration's indiscriminate seizure of phone records unnecessarily tramples personal privacy and civil liberties. The critical balance between national security and the constitutional rights of the American people must always be honored."

The vote follows the disclosure of information about the NSA's surveillance programs, which have been collecting both Internet data and phone records from all Americans. The NSA does this under a section of the 2001 Patriot Act that allows the government to collect such information if it certifies to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the records are "relevant" to a foreign intelligence or international terrorism investigation.

"My vote barring the NSA from engaging in blanket surveillance programs was aimed at reforming how the NSA carries out its responsibilities to protect our country, minus a massive dragnet," Rep. Eshoo said.

Elena Kadvany

Comments

Steve Taffee
Menlo Park: The Willows
on Jul 25, 2013 at 1:01 pm
Steve Taffee, Menlo Park: The Willows
on Jul 25, 2013 at 1:01 pm
Like this comment

Wow! When was the last time that a significant number of Republicans and Democrats agreed on anything? Unfortunately, they did not carry the day as a slightly larger number of did not support the amendment.

I agree with Eshoo's assessment that the Patriot Act has overreached its original authority and intent, and it's time to restore balance to constitutional liberties and curtail certain surveillance practices.

With such a close outcome there's hope that the House will revisit this in the future.


Joseph E. Davis
Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Jul 26, 2013 at 12:46 pm
Joseph E. Davis, Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Jul 26, 2013 at 12:46 pm
Like this comment

I commend Eshoo and Speier on a sensible vote.

Pelosi performed disgracefully.


Cass Apple
Atherton: West Atherton
on Jul 29, 2013 at 6:11 pm
Cass Apple, Atherton: West Atherton
on Jul 29, 2013 at 6:11 pm
Like this comment

I respect Rep. Eshoo, although I believe she aired in supporting this bill.
Because of her prior experience on the House Intelligence Committee, I hoped she would have more fully recognized the enormous difficulties in attempting to identify and prevent the tiny activities which are individual terrorist attacks.
The NSA program was using one of our major strengths, the ability to find relationships among massive volumes of information. By imposing major time-consuming delays on collection and analysis, and also preventing its use in discovering unforeseen results, the advantage in this very long term struggle tips toward our disparate adversaries, particularly as they can gain advantages not just by successfully attacking but also by increasing the cost, delay and complexity of our responses.
I further hope that those opposed to this program will consider that the use of the information is restricted to intelligence activities. Further, those conducting these activities understand that their activities will be most effective if they prevent that barrier from ever being breached.


El Norte
Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Jul 30, 2013 at 9:41 am
El Norte, Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Jul 30, 2013 at 9:41 am
Like this comment

"prevent the tiny activities which are individual terrorist attacks"

The 'lone wolf' attack, by its very nature, will not be hampered by massively intrusive searches violating the 4th amendment. AS an example, the Times Square bomber may have made many overseas calls, was already on a watch list, yet it was an alert street vendor who called NYPD.

"I further hope that those opposed to this program will consider that the use of the information is restricted to intelligence activities."

Allow me to correct your hope: "I further hope that those opposed to this program will consider that the use of the information is HOPEFULLY restricted to intelligence activities."

You have no way of knowing whether that kind of spying on Americans is restricted to what is claimed. We don't know if Obama spied on Romney, or if Bush spied on Kerry. Consider the stakes.

See the local threads on license plate readers and the police abuse of private data. Who watches the watchers? FISA? Ha!!

FISA is a rubber stamp with no adversarial process to protect Americans or the Constitution:

Web Link

"The Obama Administration says the FISA court adequately safeguards Americans' civil liberties. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin, who holds the second-highest Democratic leadership position in the Senate, disagrees.

"These FISA courts—there should be a real court proceeding," he said on Sunday. "In this case, it's fixed in a way. It's loaded. There's only one case coming before the FISA court: the government's case. Let's have an advocate, or someone, standing up for civil liberties, to speak up for the privacy of Americans when they make each of these decisions, and let's release some of the transcripts, redacted, carefully redacted, so that people understand the debate that's going on in these FISA courts." When you've got a senior lawmaker calling a secret court "fixed in a way," implying that it doesn't conduct "real" proceedings, and affirming that its judges aren't hearing information that would be relevant to their decisions, that's alarming.

Unless, of course, what you want is a rubber stamp for the surveillance state."

Don't like it coming from a liberal? Shouldn't take long to find a similar quote from a libertarian. Rand (only senator to vote against the FBI Director)? You're up....


gunste
Portola Valley: Ladera
on Jul 30, 2013 at 1:10 pm
gunste, Portola Valley: Ladera
on Jul 30, 2013 at 1:10 pm
Like this comment

Now that Edward Snowden has alerted the Congress and the public to the excesses of the NSA, we need to thank him. Congress, which almost voted to cut some NSA programs should pass a resolution thanking Snowden and inviting him back home. No jury of his peers would convict him, only a collection of ideologues would do so. He provided a real service to the country, just like Daniel Ellsberg did after the Vietnam war.
The rush to indict him was ill advised and does not suit the current administration. Whistle blowers are sorely needed in the Federal and local government


Lisa
Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Jul 30, 2013 at 10:49 pm
Lisa, Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Jul 30, 2013 at 10:49 pm
Like this comment


Yes! Fear and intimidation are becoming our norm and will get worse if no one objects, takes risks, realizing what's at stake. Called a form of checks and balances, of all types, we desperately need to not punish those who try to inform others who would not KNOW otherwise.
But the reaction came from bigger fish with large agendas.


Name hidden
Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle

on Jun 4, 2017 at 5:14 pm
Name hidden, Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle

on Jun 4, 2017 at 5:14 pm

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.